期刊文献+

特殊教育中循证实践标准设立的困境与应对 被引量:10

Difficulties and Countermeasures for Establishing Evidence-based Practice Standards in Special Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着特殊教育的发展,教学与干预方法的种类愈加丰富,教育工作者们一直致力于追求最佳实践方式来提高特殊教育的质量,循证实践标准即为这种认识追求的产物。标准的设立却产生了特殊教育人文性与技术性的争论、标准设立是否合理以及其在教育实践中的效用问题三大困境。以上问题的解决需要以特殊教育的循证实践标准立足于学生、扩充循证实践标准设立中对证据的认识、以环形模式促进证据与实践的融合为对策,从而真正提升特殊教育实践的有效性。 With the development of special education, people strive to pursue the best practice to improve the quality of special education. As a result, more and more teaching and intervention methods have emerged, one of which is the establishment of evidence-based practice standards in the field of special education. However, evidence-based practice standards arose three major difficulties: the controversy over humanities and technology in special education, whether the standards are reasonable and their effectiveness in practice. Strategies for solving the difficulties may include, first, the evidence-based practice in special education should stick to the people-oriented principle. Second, the practice-based evidence should pay attention to the criterion of evidence. Third, the circular model can be used to connect the evidence with practice.
作者 傅王倩 黄晓磊 肖非 FU Wangqian;HUANG Xiaolei;XIAO Fei(Institute of special education, Faculty of education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;Institute of educational principles, Faculty of education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第7期104-111,共8页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 特殊教育实践 循证实践 基于实践的证据 special education practice evidence-based practice practice-based evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献70

  • 1赵淑英,唐美秀,刘娟,吴小敏,刘霞.长沙市小学生学习能力现况及其影响因素分析[J].长沙医学院学报,2007(1):11-16. 被引量:2
  • 2邓乾辉.自闭症儿童教育康复的探析[J].中国校外教育,2008(5). 被引量:2
  • 3李润洲,石中英.人·学习·学习能力——构建学习型社会的哲学思考[J].教育学报,2006,2(1):62-67. 被引量:35
  • 4黄藤.学校教育基本功能新探[J].教育研究,2006,27(10):73-76. 被引量:10
  • 5Ax, J. & Ponte, P. (2010). Moral issues in educational praxis: A perspective from pedagogiek and didactiek as human sciences in continental Europe. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1), 29-42.
  • 6Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • 7Biesta, G. J.J. (2005). What can critical pedagogy learn from postmodernism? Further reflections on the impossible future of critical pedagogy. I. Gur Ze'ev (ed) , Critical theory and critical pedagogy today. Toward a new critical language in education. Haifa : Studies in Education (University of Haifa) ,pp. 143-159.
  • 8Biesta, G. J. J. (2007a). Why "what works" won't work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research. Educational Theory, 57 ( 1 ), 1-22.
  • 9Biesta, G. J.J. (2007b). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (3), 295-301.
  • 10Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Values and ideals in teachers' professional judgement. S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall & A. Cribb (eds). Changing teacher professionalism (pp. 184-193). London: Routledge.

共引文献57

同被引文献161

引证文献10

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部