期刊文献+

中国国际法自主知识体系的实践逻辑 被引量:1

The Practical Logic of China's Autonomous Knowledge System
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国国际法学自主知识体系的构建不仅需要有理念上的自信与共识,更需要在实践中自立自强、坚实推进。中国自主知识体系的构建需要立足中国的历史文化与当代现实,国际法领域的自主知识体系,由于具有面对世界的特征,更要敏锐发现中国问题、清晰界定中国问题、明确树立中国观念、深入探索中国实践、扎实论证中国概念、系统总结中国理论。构建国际法自主知识体系的实践标准包括六个方面:以真切的中国问题为研究对象,体现研究主体和客体的持续性,确保理论界与实践界协同合作,积极开展学术团队的坦诚交流,保证提出分析与论断的透彻性,强化形成论断与学说的体系性。从实践方法上看,构建国际法自主知识体系应采取的方式包括实证法方法、归因型方法、反思性方法、新建型方法四种,国际法自主知识体系的生成路径则包括基于既有理论、基于数据资料、基于实践经验三种可能。通过持续、系统、透彻的理论耕耘,积极开放的理念传播,最终促进自主知识体系的形成与完善。 The construction of China's autonomous knowledge system of international law requires not only conceptual consensus,but also solid promotion in practice.The construction of China's autonomous knowledge system is a proposition with clear timeliness and practicality.The core of an autonomous knowledge system is knowledge,"autonomous and system"are both concrete attributions of knowledge.The autonomous knowledge system requires continuous improvement of autonomy on the basis of public and professional knowledge,gradually reaching systematic standards.For Chinese international law,this requirement means further enhancing the ability to make independent judgments and think on the basis of existing information and knowledge,and further improving the systematic nature of international legal thinking and theory.The construction of an independent knowledge system needs to be based on China,reflect China's concerns,clarify China's position,and voice China's voice.Clearly define China's issues and provide clear explanations of the issues that China should address in its development process;clearly establish the concept of China and propose the basic principles that China should follow in its current economic,social,and cultural development;deeply explore China's practices and fully summarize China's experience in military,political,economic,cultural and other fields;solidly demonstrate the concept of China,and through in-depth argumentation and repeated refinement,summarize legal terms that highlight Chinese characteristics;systematically summarize Chinese theory,organically combine international law concepts and judgments with Chinese characteristics,forming the argumentative spectrum of Chinese international law.The practical standards for building an independent knowledge system of international law include six aspects:(1)Focus on the real Chinese context as the research object,focus on the core concerns faced by China's survival and development,and having a comprehensive understanding of China as its environment.(2)Reflect the continuity of research subjects and objects,advocate the construction of long-term teams from the perspective of academic researchers,and also advocate continuous tracking from the perspective of research content.(3)Ensure collaboration between the theoretical and practical communities,and establish a factual foundation for knowledge production.(4)Actively engage in honest communication with academic teams to promote openness in knowledge production and testing.(5)Ensure the thoroughness of analysis and argumentation,and promote the continuous upgrading of academic research quality.(6)Strengthen the systematic formation of judgments and theories,and promote the internal consistency and external organic correlation of academic theoretical research through logical,theoretical,and practical tests.From the perspective of practical methods,the technical paths that should be adopted to build an autonomous knowledge system of international law include empirical methods,attribution methods,reflective methods,and new methods.The generation path of an autonomous knowledge system of international law includes three possible paths:based on existing theories,based on data,and based on practical experience.Through continuous,systematic,and thorough theoretical cultivation,active and open dissemination of ideas,ultimately promoting the formation and improvement of an independent knowledge system.
作者 何志鹏 HE Zhi-peng
出处 《当代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第5期18-37,共20页 Contemporary Law Review
基金 教育部哲学社会科学重大专项项目“坚持统筹推进国内法治与涉外法治研究”(2022JZDZ005)的阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

共引文献1755

同被引文献37

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部