期刊文献+

体外冲击波碎石术治疗冠状动脉支架术后患者尿路结石的可行性及效果观察 被引量:10

Feasibility and effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on urinary calculi in patients after coronary stent implantation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗冠状动脉支架术后患者尿路结石的可行性及效果。方法选取2010年1月至2016年12月于首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院采用ESWL治疗的冠状动脉支架术后尿路结石患者56例作为观察组,选取同期56例未行冠状动脉支架术、因尿路结石行ESWL治疗的患者为对照组。比较2组碎石成功率及肉眼血尿、肾绞痛、发热、泌尿系感染等发生情况。结果2组碎石成功率差异无统计学意义[89.3%(50/56)比89.3%(50/56)](P〉0.05)。术后2组肉眼血尿、肾绞痛、发热、泌尿系感染发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论ESWL可以作为冠状动脉支架术后患者尿路结石的治疗方法之一,并与一般尿路结石患者具有相似的治疗效果。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treating urinary tract calculi after coronary artery stent implantation. Methods From January 2010 to December 2016, 56 patients undergoing ESWL for urinary calculi after coronary stent implantation were enrolled as observation group in Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; 56 patients without coronary disease who were undergoing ESWL for urinary calculi were enrolled as control group. The success rate of lithotripsy and incidences of hematuria, renal colic, fever and urinary infection were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference of lithotripsy success rate between groups E 89. 3% ( 50/56 ) vs 89. 3% ( 50/56 ) ] ( P 〉 0. 05 ). There were no significant differences of incidences of hematuria, renal colic, fever and urinary infection between groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion ESWL can be used as an appropriate method for treatment of urinary calculi after coronary stent implantation.
出处 《中国医药》 2017年第6期917-919,共3页 China Medicine
关键词 体外冲击波碎石 冠状动脉支架植入术 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Coronary stent implantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献68

  • 1田晶,郭宏骞,孙西钊,孙则禹.体外冲击波碎石术关键参数记述系统的研究[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(10):78-79. 被引量:5
  • 2文瀚东,潘铁军,李志强,钱卫红,刘志敏.经皮肾输尿管镜碎石取石术联合ESWL治疗肾功能不全的孤立肾鹿角形结石[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(6):444-445. 被引量:10
  • 3曾国华,钟文,李逊,陈文忠,杨后猛,袁坚,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣,吴开俊.一期多通道微创经皮肾穿刺取石术治疗鹿角状结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(4):250-252. 被引量:71
  • 4Onnors N. The effect of discharge voltage on renal injury and impairment caused by lithotripsy in the pig. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2000,11 :310-318.
  • 5Biri H, Ozturk HS, Buyukkecak S, et al. Antioxidant defense potential of rabbit renal tissues after ESWL: protective effects of antioxidant vitamins. Nephron, 1998,29 : 181-185.
  • 6Evan AP, Connors BA, Pennington DJ, et al. Renal disease potentiares the injury caused by shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol, 1999,13:619-628.
  • 7Begun FP, Lawson RP, Kearns CM, et al. Electrohydraulie shock wave induced renal injury. J Urol, 1989,142 : 155-159.
  • 8Wolff JM. Evaluation of possible tissue damage in ptients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1997,31:31-34.
  • 9Lingeman JE. ESWL:development instrumentation and current status. Urol Clin of North Am,1997,24:185-211.
  • 10Sheir KZ, EL-Sheikh AM, Ghoneim MA, et al. Synchronous twinpulse technique to improve efficacy of SWL:preliminary results of an experimental study. J Endourol,2001,15 :965-974.

共引文献102

同被引文献87

引证文献10

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部