期刊文献+

基于主从博弈的碳排放税制定方法 被引量:6

TAXING STRATEGIES FOR CARBON EMISSIONS BASED ON STACKELBERG GAME
原文传递
导出
摘要 提出了一种基于主从博弈的碳排放税制定方法,可同时兼顾节能减排目标与电网企业经济利益,为制定相关政策提供参考.该主从博弈的上层决策者是政府机构,旨在制定最优税率方案,以最少的税收将系统的碳排放量限制在容许范围内,下层决策者是电网企业,旨在以最低的发电成本满足系统负荷需求.上述主从博弈可进一步转化为混合整数线性规划问题,并通过CPLEX进行求解.加机系统算例表明了所提模型与方法的合理性与有效性. This paper presents a method to determine carbon tax on different gen- erating units based on Stackelberg game, which can strike a balance between carbon emission reduction and the profit of energy industry. The upper-level decision maker is the government agency who aims to limit total carbon emissions within a certain level with minimal additional cost by setting optimM tax rates for different generating units. The lower-level decision maker is the grid operator who wants to minimize the total production cost through executing an economic dispatch while considering the tax levied by the government. The Stackelberg game model is finally formulated as a mixed integer linear program and solved by CPLEX. Case studies on a 10 unit system demonstrate the validity of the proposed model and method.
出处 《系统科学与数学》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期1055-1067,共13页 Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基金 基金委创新群体项目(51321005) 中国电力科学研究院院士合作项目(XTB51201303968) 自然科学基金(51007041)资助课题
关键词 主从博弈 电力系统 碳排放税 混合整数线性规划 Stackelberg game, power systems, carbon emission tax, mixed-integer linear programming.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献63

  • 1杨明,韩学山,王士柏,查浩.不确定运行条件下电力系统鲁棒调度的基础研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2011,31(S1):100-107. 被引量:50
  • 2李洪心,付伯颖.对环境税的一般均衡分析与应用模式探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(3):19-22. 被引量:49
  • 3杜放.建立我国生态税收体系思考——排污费税改革及税制的全面绿化设想[J].财政研究,2006,22(2):65-67. 被引量:4
  • 4PEPERMANS G, DRIESEN J, HAESELDONCKX D. Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues [J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(6): 787- 798.
  • 5WANG L, SINGH C. PSO based multi-criteria optimum design of a grid-connected hybrid power system with multiple renewable sources of energy[C]// Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium (SIS 2007), April 1- 5, 2007, Honolulu, HI, USA.
  • 6YANG H, LU L, ZHOU W. A novel optimization sizing model for hybrid solar-wind power generation system [J ]. Solar Energy, 2007, 81(1): 76-84.
  • 7CHUANG A S, WU F, VARAIYA P. A game-theoretic model for generation expansion planning: problem formulation and numerical comparisons [J].IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2001, 16(4): 885-891.
  • 8GUAN X, HO Y, PEPYNE D L. Gaming and price spikes in electric power markets [J].IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2001, 16(3): 402-408.
  • 9SINGH H. Introduction to game theory and its application in electric power markets [J]. IEEE Computer Applications in Power, 1999, 12(4):18-22.
  • 10MYERSON R B. Game theory: analysis of conflict[M]. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1991.

共引文献237

同被引文献73

引证文献6

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部