期刊文献+

多期碳限额与交易下企业产品减排决策

Firm’s Product Carbon Reduction Decisions in a Multi-Period Cap-and-Trade Scheme
原文传递
导出
摘要 在碳限额与交易政策约束下,减排企业不仅要考虑当期的碳排放量,还需要考虑在"祖父原则"下当期决策对后期碳配额的影响,以及碳交易价格的时间动态性.文章综合考虑减排投入成本和政府碳政策,研究企业在多期生产中的减排决策和产品定价问题.结论表明:1)在一定成本和碳政策条件下,企业会进行产品减排,最优减排率和产品价格由减排技术参数、下期碳配额比例和多期碳价共同决定;2)企业单期利润是当期碳价的凹函数,是下期碳价和碳配额分配比例的凸函数;3)企业通过产品减排可以增加产品需求和增加企业利润,同时会增加产量,但是企业在进行产品减排时的多期总排放量总是低于传统企业,可降低社会总体排放水平. Constraint,by the cap-and-trade regulation,firms would analyze their current carbon emissions and the impacts to the next period’s carbon permits allocation in "grandfathering rule" and the carbon trading price fluetuation in time.This paper considers the firm’s carhon reduction costs and carbon regulations to analyze firm’s carbon reduction and pricing decisions in a multi-period production problem.The findings are:1) Firms will reduce product carbon emissions in certain costs and policy conditions.The optimal carbon reduction rate and price are decided by carhon abatement technology parameters,sequential period’s carbon allocation ratio and carbon prices.2) Firm’s single period’s profit is concave in current period’s carbon price and convex in next period’s carbon price and carbon allocation ratio.3) The firm’s product carbon reduction will increase demand and firm’s profit,and the social emissions is reduced because less emissions are emit ted compared to the non-carbon reduction counterparts.
作者 唐文之 朱扬光 董尹 TANG Wenzhi;ZHU Yangguang;DONG Yin(School of Economics and Management,Hefei University,Hefei 230601;School of Economics,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009)
出处 《系统科学与数学》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第8期1253-1263,共11页 Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(71904041,71603069,71801073) 安徽高校人文社科研究项目(SK2018A0598,SK2017ZD46)资助课题
关键词 碳限额与交易 减排 祖父原则 时间动态性 Carbon cap-and-trade carbon reduction grandfathering rule timedynamic
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1王迎军.顾客需求驱动的供应链契约问题综述[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(2):68-76. 被引量:60
  • 2Wang Miaoling, Kuo T C. Identifying target green 3C customer in Taiwan using multi-attribute utility theory [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(10): 12562-12569.
  • 3惠晓霜.太平洋岛国规划举国搬迁-拟在领国斐济购买土地[N/OL].北京日报,2012.3.11.
  • 4Low carbon ((2012-03-11). bjrb. bid. com. en/html/ 2012-03/11/Content Content_58558. htm) products in demand despite challenging economic climate [EB/OL]. http://www, guardian, co. uk/environment/2011/jul/ 01/carbon-trust-research-footprint-eonsumer-demand.
  • 5Vanclay J, Shortiss J, Aulsebrook S. Customer re- sponse to carbon labelling of groceries [J].Journal of Consumer Policy, 2011, 34(1): 153-160.
  • 6Kovas G. Corporate environmental responsibility in the supply chain [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, 16(5): 1517-1578.
  • 7Cruz J. Dynamics of supply chain networks with corpo- rate social responsibility through integrated environmen- tal decision-making [J]. European Journal of Opera- tional Research, 2008, 184(3) : 1005-1031.
  • 8Cruze J. Modeling the relationship of globalized supply chains and corporate social responsibility [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 56: 73-85.
  • 9Seuring S, Sarkis J, Muller M. Sustainability and sup- ply chain management-an introduction to the special issue [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, 16 (15): 1545-1551.
  • 10Porter M. , Kramer M. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social re-sponsibility [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84 (12) : 78-92.

共引文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部