摘要
《侵权责任法》第28条一般性地确认了第三人行为作为免责事由的法律地位,然而,这种做法对司法实践而言,并无意义。在第三人行为中断了被告加害行为与损害后果之间的因果关系时,被告可以免除责任。至于第三人行为与被告行为共同造成损害的情形,则适用《侵权责任法》第8-12条的规定,属于多数人侵权责任。第三人行为能否普遍适用于危险责任,取决于危险范围等因素,即第三人行为的发生是否本身就属于责任人应当负责的危险范围。在判断第三人行为能否中断因果关系时,需要考虑第三人行为的类型以及被告所违反的法律规范的目的。
Article 28 of China Tort Liability Law（CTLL） generally confirmsacts of third parties as an independentexemp- tion; however, it is useless for legal practice. When an act of third party broke the causation between the behavior of defendant and the damage, the defendant may be exempted from liability. As for the case of an act of third partyand the act of defendant jointly cause the damage, Article 8-12 of CTLL can be applied.Whether acts of third parties can apply to dangerous behavior responsibility depends on the scope of dangerous. In determining whether acts of third parties interrupt the causation, the type of behavior and the purpose of legal norms that the defendant violated should be considered.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期48-60,共13页
Law Review
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"损害赔偿法基础理论之研究"(12YJA820009)阶段性成果
