期刊文献+

正常乳腺不同月经周期表观扩散系数的变化分析 被引量:1

Analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient changes in normal breast glands during different menstrual cycles
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析不同类型正常乳腺不同月经周期表观扩散系数的差异,为乳腺疾病的诊断提供依据。方法 55例20~49岁月经正常妇女,于晚卵泡期、黄体晚期行磁共振平扫及扩散加权成像(DWI)检查未发现乳腺疾患,根据Wolf分型,致密型16例,分叶串珠型39例,扩散敏感因子b取0、1000s/mm2,测量双乳乳头层面腺体平均ADC值。结果双乳晚卵泡期ADC值明显低于黄体晚期(t=-5.126、-5.896,P<0.01);晚卵泡期致密型腺体ADC值明显高于分叶串珠型腺体(t=2.186、2.495,P<0.05),黄体晚期致密型腺体ADC值与分叶串珠型差异无统计学意义(t=2.003、1.856,P>0.05)。结论乳腺腺体ADC值晚卵泡期降低明显,致密型腺体ADC值受月经周期影响较分叶串珠型腺体小。 Objective To analyse the differences of apparent diffusion coefficient( ADC) in different kinds of normal breast glands during different menstrual cycles,and to provide the diagnostic proof of breast diseases. Methods Fifty-five cases of women aged 20 ~ 49,had normal menstruation were examined in later follicular phase and later corpus luteum phase,respectively by MR plain scan and MR diffusion weighed imaging( DWI) ,and no breast disease was found. Wolf typing showed dense form in 16 cases and sublobe-hiaqua form in 39 cases. The average mammary gland ADC values were measured at the bilateral nipple level when b value was given from 1000 to 0 s/mm2. Results The ADC value of bilateral mammary gland in later follicular phase was markedly lower than that in the later corpus luteum phase( P 0. 01) ,in which ADC value of the dense form mammary gland was obviously higher than that of the sublobe-hiaqua form mammary gland( P 0. 05) . The difference between the ADC values of dense form mammary gland and the sublobe-hiaqua form mammary gland in later corpus luteum phase had no statistical significance. Conclusion The ADC values of mammary gland decreases significantly in later follicular phase. Comparing with the sublobe-hiaqua form mammary gland,the ADC value of dense form mammary gland is less influenced by the menstruation cycle.
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第31期32-34,共3页 Shandong Medical Journal
关键词 乳腺 磁共振 表观扩散系数 mammary gland magnetic resonance imaging apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Orel S.Who should have breast magnetic resonance imaging evaluation?[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(5):703-711.
  • 2Bammer R.Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging[J].Eur J Radiol,2003,45(3):169-184.
  • 3Reddy JS,Mishra AM,Behari S,et al.The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic mass lesions:a report of 147 lesions[J].Surg Neurol,2006,66(3):246-250.
  • 4Partridge SC,McKinnon GC,Henry RG,et al.Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficient measured in the normal breast using MRI[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,14(4):433-438.
  • 5Guo Y,Cai YQ,Cai ZL,et al.Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2002,16(2):172-178.
  • 6Sinha S,Sinha U.Functional magnetic resonance of human breast tumors:diffusion and perfusion imaging[J].Ann N Y Acad Sci,2002,980(12):95-115.
  • 7Woodhams R,Matsunaga K,Kan S,et al.ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors[J].Magn Reson Med Sci,2005,4(1):35-42.
  • 8Kinoshita T,Yashiro N,Ihara N,et al.Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors:differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma[J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2002,26(6):1042-1046.
  • 9谢洁林,汪登斌,陈克敏.乳腺磁共振扩散成像表观弥散系数值差异的比较研究[J].外科理论与实践,2008,13(2):126-129. 被引量:15
  • 10蔡世峰,赵斌,王光彬,于台飞.不同类型正常乳腺表观扩散系数值差异的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(2):176-179. 被引量:12

二级参考文献23

  • 1赵斌,蔡世峰,高佩虹,彭洪娟.MR扩散加权成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):497-500. 被引量:146
  • 2蔡世峰,赵斌,王光彬,于台飞.不同类型正常乳腺表观扩散系数值差异的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(2):176-179. 被引量:12
  • 3Kolb TM,Lichy J,Newhouse JH.Comparisons of the performance of screening mammography,physical examinations,and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them:an analysis of 27,825 patients evaluations.Radiology,2002,225:165-175.
  • 4Muller MF,Prasad P,Siewert B,et al.Abdominal diffusion mapping with use of a whole-body echo-planar system.Radiology,1994,190:475-478.
  • 5Aube C,Racineux PX,Lebigot J,et al.Diagnosis and quantification of hepatic fibrosis with diffusion weighted MR imaging:preliminary results.J Radiol,2004,85:301-306.
  • 6Partridge SC,McKinnon GC,Henry RG,et al.Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficient measured in the normal breast using MRI.J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,14:433-438.
  • 7Sinha S,Lucas-Quesada FA,Sinha U,et al.In vivo diffusionweighted MRI of the breast:potential for lesion characterization.J Magn Reson Imaging,2002,15:693-704.
  • 8Morvan D.In vivo measurement of diffusion and pseudo-perfusion in skeletal muscle at rest and after exercise.Magn Reson Imaging,1995,13:193-199.
  • 9Bammer R. Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging[J]. Eur J Radiol,2003,45(3):169-184.
  • 10Reddy JS, Mishra AM, Behari S, et al. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic mass lesions: a report of 147 lesions[J]. Surg Neurol,2006,66(3):246-250.

共引文献23

同被引文献12

  • 1蔡世峰,赵斌,王光彬,于台飞.不同类型正常乳腺表观扩散系数值差异的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(2):176-179. 被引量:12
  • 2Palle L, Reddy B. Role of diffusion MRI in characterizing benign and malignant breast lesions [J]. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2009, 19 (4): 287-290.
  • 3Bammer R. Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2003, 45(3): 169-184.
  • 4Reddy JS, Mishra AM, Behari S, et al. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic mass le- sions: a report of 147 lesions [J]. Surg Neurol, 2006, 66(3): 246- 250.
  • 5Aube C, Racineux PX, Lebigot J, et al. Diagnosis and quantification of hepatic fibrosis with diffusion weighted MR imaging: prelimi- nary results [J]. J Radiol, 2004, 85(3): 301-306.
  • 6Partridge SC, McKinnon GC, Henry RG, et al. Menstrual cycle vari- ation of apparent diffusion coefficient measured in the normal breastusing MRI [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001, 14(4): 433-438.
  • 7Heron DE, Komamicky LT, Hyslop T, et al. Bilateralbreast carcino- ma: risk factors and outcomes for patientswith synchronous and metachronous disease [J]. Cancer, 2000, 88(12): 2739-2750.
  • 8Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the con- tralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356(13): 1295-1303.
  • 9谢洁林,汪登斌,陈克敏.乳腺磁共振扩散成像表观弥散系数值差异的比较研究[J].外科理论与实践,2008,13(2):126-129. 被引量:15
  • 10王开香,邢伟,俞胜男,邱建国,陈杰,杨荷霞.乳腺良恶性病变的磁共振弥散加权成像鉴别诊断[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2011,17(4):323-326. 被引量:16

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部