期刊文献+

扩散敏感因子800时乳腺良恶性病变ADC界值的确定 被引量:6

Value of diffusion weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions:affirmation of ADC cut-off value as b value equals to 800s/mm^2
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:确定扩散敏感因子为800s/mm2时乳腺良恶性病变的ADC界值,评价MR扩散加权成像(DWI)对乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断的价值。方法:回顾性分析经手术病理证实的70例(78个病灶)乳腺病变的DWI图像,其中良性病变26例(31个病灶),恶性病变44例(47个病灶)。测量DWI图像上显示的病变表观扩散系数(ADC)值。通过ROC曲线确定ADC值的诊断阈值,并以此值进行鉴别诊断,同时计算ROC曲线下面积。结果:良恶性病变的ADC值均符合正态性分布,良恶性病变的ADC平均值分别为(1.46±0.26)×10-3mm2/s和(1.02±0.19)×10-3mm2/s,恶性病变的ADC值明显低于良性病变(P<0.05)。约登指数最大法确定的ADC诊断阈值为1.28×10-3mm2/s,以此值进行鉴别诊断时的敏感度、特异度和诊断符合率分别为93.6%,75.9%,86.8%;阳性似然比最大法确定的ADC诊断阈值为1.035×10-3mm2/s,以此值进行鉴别诊断时的敏感度、特异度和诊断符合率分别为46.8%,96.6%,65.8%;ROC曲线下面积为0.905(95%可信区间为0.836~0.975)。结论:扩散敏感因子为800s/mm2时乳腺良恶性病变的ADC界值确定为1.28×10-3mm2/s,DWI的ADC值测定有助于乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断。 Objective:To affirm the cut-off value of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) when b value=800s/mm^2 in the differential diagnosis of benign or malignant breast lesions,and to evaluate the diffusion weighted MR imaging(DWI) in the diagnosis of breast diseases.Methods:Bilateral breast axial DWI were performed in seventy female patients(78 lesions) having surgery and histo-pathology proven breast lesions,with benign(26 cases,31 lesions) and malignant(44 cases,47 lesions).and the imaging materials were retrospectively analyzed.The ADC values of all breast lesions were calculated and its threshold of differentiating benign or malignant lesions was affirmed with receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC),area under ROC was calculated as well.Results:Twenty-nine benign lesions(29/31) and forty-seven malignant lesions(47/47) were visible on DWI.The ADC values of benign and malignant lesions were(1.46±0.26)×10^-3mm^2/s and(1.02±0.19)×10^-3mm^2/s respectively.The ADC value of malignant lesions were markedly lower than that of benign lesions,with significant statistical difference(P0.05).The threshold between benign and malignant lesions was 1.28×10^-3mm^2/s by the method of Youden index maximum,with the sensitivity,specificity,and accuracy as 93.6%,75.9%,and 86.8%,respectively.The threshold was 1.035×10^-3mm^2/s by the method of positive likelihood ratio maximum according to ROC,with the sensitivity,specificity,and accuracy as 46.8%,96.6%,and 65.8%,respectively.Area under ROC was 0.905(95% confidence interval was 0.836-0.975).Conclusion:When b value=800s/mm^2,the cut-off value of ADC in differentiating diagnosis benign or malignant breast lesions was affirmed as 1.28×10^-3mm^2/s.Measurement of ADC value on DWI is an effective parameter in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2010年第5期515-518,共4页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 乳腺疾病 磁共振成像 扩散 磁共振成像 Breast diseases Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献43

共引文献311

同被引文献58

  • 1赵斌,蔡世峰,高佩虹,彭洪娟.MR扩散加权成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):497-500. 被引量:146
  • 2汪晓红,彭卫军,杨文涛,顾雅佳,杨天锡.乳腺纤维腺瘤的MRI表现及与病理对照[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(5):467-471. 被引量:28
  • 3Hillman B J, Neiman H L. Radiology 2012: radiology and radiologists a decade hence-a strategic analysis for radioIogy from the second annual American College of Radiology FORUM[J]. Radiology, 2003,227(1):9-14.
  • 4Cam O H, Tekin M, Acar G O, et al. What is the Role of Diffusion Weigh Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules[J]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2014,66(3):336-340.
  • 5Mclaughlin R L, Newitt D C, Wilmes L J, et al. High resolution in vivo characterization of apparent diffusion coefficient at the tumor-stromal boundary of breast carcinomas:a pilot study to assess treatment response using proximity- dependent diffusion-weighted imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014,39(5):1308-1313.
  • 6Fondrinier E, Lorimier G, Guerin Boblet V, et al. Breast micro - calcifications: multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for carcinoma [ J ]. World J Surg, 2002,26 ( 3 ) : 290 - 296.
  • 7Akita A, Tanimoto A, Jinno H, et al. The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifica tions on mam- mography [ J ]. Eur Radiol,2009,19 (9) : 2089 - 2096.
  • 8Uematsu T,Yuen S, Kasami M, et al. Dynamic co ntrast - en- hanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalc fication lesions of the breast: is there any value [ J ]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2007,103 ( 3 ) :269 -281.
  • 9Fiaschetti V, Pistolese C A, Perretta T, et al. 3 -5 BI - RADs Microcalcifications: Correlation between MR[ and His- tological Findings[J]. Isrn Oncology, 2011,2011:643890.
  • 10Jiang Y, Lou J, Wang S, et al. Evaluation of the Role of Dynamic Contrast - Enhanced MR Imaging for Patients with BI - RADS 3 - 4 Microcalcifications [ J ]. Plos One, 2014, 9(6) :99669.

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部