摘要
近年来台湾地区的刑事诉讼经历了重大的改革,其审判制度吸取了当事人主义审判方式的内容,司法机关和立法机关都着力加强人权保障,大幅缩减了检察机关的权力。台湾的这些改革总体上取得了较好的效果,但也存在诉讼法律移植时片面、忽视实际,以及未对一些人权保障方面存在缺陷的立法进行改革的不足。台湾的经验对大陆的刑事诉讼改革有几点启示与借鉴,即司法改革必须进行诉讼权力结构的调整,要肯定和支持司法机关对于刑事诉讼改革的积极作用,要积极稳妥地借鉴两大法系审判方式的长处,但要加强配套措施,同时在诉讼法律移植时应全面和审慎。
In recent years, the criminal procedure of Taiwan experienced great reform, it＇s judge manner absorbed some anglo- american character, both judicial system and legislative system made great efforts to strengthen human rights protection, and the power of prosecuting attorney was weakened. In whole ,Taiwan＇s reform was successful, but limitation did exist. Those reform had illumination to the criminal procedure reform of mainland. Redressal of power is necessary to judicial reform, and the reform effort of judicial system should be supported. Both anglo - american and continental judge manner can be introduced into China, but it＇s necessary to perfect accessary measures. Law transplant should be carried out carefully and comprehensively.
出处
《台湾研究集刊》
CSSCI
2010年第3期36-45,共10页
Taiwan Research Journal
关键词
台湾地区
刑事诉讼改革
启示
Taiwan, criminal procedure reform, illumination
