摘要
《伤寒论》第101条写道:"伤寒中风,有柴胡证,但见一证便是,不必悉具……"。后世医家或伤寒论注家对此"一证"争论不休、莫衷一是。本文搜集了部分古今医家及伤寒论注家对此条文的见解,并列举分析了张仲景临证时运用小柴胡汤的17个条文,认为张仲景条文中的"一证"即柴胡证有13种情形,它们都是一个个包含许多症状的证候群,而后世许多医家、注家却简单片面地将"一证"或柴胡证理解为一个个单一的症状。
The one hundred and first item in shanghanlun is written like this：＂Minor decoction of Bupleurum could be given, once one of the Syndromes came out in shanghan or wind-stroke.＂The subsequent doctors or interpreters of shanghanlun held different opinions on ＂one syndrome＂and argued for a long time. Part of different opinions on this item from the doctors in ancient time and nowadays as well as the interpreters are collected and seventeen items as examples are analysed in which Zhang Zhongjing applied Minor decoction of Bupleurum to the patients. These proved that＂one syndrome＂in the item of Zhang Zhongjing actually means the syndrome of Minor decoction of Bupleurum has thirteen kinds of situation and all of these are syndrome groups including many symptoms respectively, but the subsequent doctors or interpreters misunderstood the syndrome of Minor decoction of Bupleurum or＂one syndrome＂as one single symptom independently.
出处
《中医药导报》
2010年第5期11-13,共3页
Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
柴胡证
一证
悉具
The syndrome of Minor decoction of Bupleurum
One syndrome
All the symptoms coming out
