摘要
"亚文化"既可以指有特殊行为方式的一群人,也可以指一种特殊的生活方式。亚文化群体早在西方现代化进程开启之时就已经存在,一直被描述为偏离主流社会、无固定住所、无生产力的寄生者或反叛者。芝加哥社会学学派强调偏离人群形成的社会原因,伯明翰学派则着力从阶级、种族、年龄和性别等方面揭示青年亚文化群体的特殊生活方式或风格所蕴含的象征性政治反抗意义,而"后亚文化理论"强调亚文化与符号消费、虚拟消费等当代"场景"的混杂关系。后亚文化群体的身份多元和混杂化给研究者带来更多方法论上的挑战。
Although 'subculture' as a formal academic term appeared in the 1930s,the subcultures as some special kind of people have been existing for more than 400 years. Subcultures have been described as the deviant,wandering groups without productivity. The Chicago Sociology School continues this traditional logic,analyzing the social reason of the deviant groups. The Birmingham School pays more attention to the subcultures' anti-power politics through ritual resistance,extending the dimensions of class,race,age,gender and so on. Some scholars in recent years have begun to criticize the 'heroic' idealism of the Birmingham School,emphasizing the hybridity of subculture's identity.
出处
《外国文学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第6期93-102,共10页
Foreign Literature
