期刊文献+

论理科教师科学本质教学行为的发展性评价 被引量:7

Developmental Evaluation On Science Teachers’Teaching Behavior of Nature of Science
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 培养学生适当理解科学本质是科学教育的目标之一。实现这一目标的关键是理科教师具有相应的科学本质教学行为。理科教师科学本质教学行为可以从显性教学目标、具有认识论水平的教学主题、显性区别观察和推论、注重知识产生方式、反思性评价活动、评价性作业等六个方面进行发展性评价。发展性评价的实施主要在理科教师科学本质教学行为自我监控系统指导下进行。 Helping students develop adequate understanding of nature of science(NOS) is one of objectives for science education. The key of realizing this objective is that science teahers have appropriate teaching behavior of nature of science. Main aspects of developmental evaluating science teahers' teaching behavior of nature of science are explicit instructional objective, epistemological inatructional theme, explicit distinguishment between observation and inference, the mode of knowledge-production, reflective assessment activities and evaluation assignment. Developmental evaluation may be put into effect under self-monitoring system of teaching behavior.
作者 梁永平
出处 《教育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期48-53,共6页 Education Science
关键词 理科教师 科学本质 教学行为 发展性评价 science teachers nature of science teaching behavior developmental evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1AAAS,American Association for the Advancement of science.Science for all Americans.New York:Oxford University Press,1990
  • 2Kimball,M.E.(1967-68) Understanding the nature of science:a comparison of scientists and science teachers.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,5,110-120.
  • 3Abd-El-Khalick,F.,Bell,R.L.and Lederman,N.G.(1998)The nature of science and instructional practice:making the unnatural natural.Science Education,82,417-437.
  • 4(NRC)National Research Council (1996) National Science Education Standards(Washinton,DC:National Academic Press).
  • 5全民科学素质行动计划纲要(2006-2010-2020年)[N].人民日报.2006-3-21.
  • 6中华人民共和国教育部.科学课程标准(7-9年级)[Z].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001.
  • 7袁维新.科学的本质与科学本质教育[J].课程.教材.教法,2004,24(7):68-73. 被引量:66
  • 8Shulman,L.S.(1987) Knowledge and teaching:foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57,1-22.
  • 9Rola Khishfe.&Foaud Abd-El-Khalick.(2002).Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders' Views of Nature of Science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39,551-578.
  • 10Sandoval,W.A.,& Morrison.K.(2003).Hihgh school students' ideas about theory change after a biological inquiry unit.Journal of Research in Science Teaching.40:369-392.

二级参考文献23

  • 1.中国大百科全书·教育[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1985.525.
  • 2.中国大百科全书·哲学(Ⅱ)[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1987.1169.
  • 3汤川秀树.创造力和直觉[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1997.54.
  • 4萨顿.科学的生命—文明史论集[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987..
  • 5L W Trowbridge, R J Bybee, J C Powell. Teaching Secondary School Science [M]. 7thed. Columbus,Ohio: Preentice-Hall Inc. 1996. 207.
  • 6National Research Council. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards [M]. Washington,D C: National Academy Press, 2000. 34--35.
  • 7Collette A T, Chiappetta E C. Science Instruction in the Middle and Science School [M]. Columbas U S A: Merrill, 1994. 27-47.
  • 8Suchin K. Effect of Research Experience on Teachers'Perceptions of the Nature Science (Science Training) [M]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota. 1993.
  • 9Abimbola I O. The Relevance of the "New" Philosophy of Science for the Science Curriculum [J].School Science and Mathematics 1983, (3): 181-192.
  • 10Bruner J S. The Process of Education [M]. NewYork: Vintage, 1960. 31.

共引文献75

同被引文献45

引证文献7

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部