期刊文献+

电商平台价格垄断行为规制初探 被引量:3

Research on the Regulation on Price Monopoly Behavior of E-commerce Platform
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 电子商务的飞速发展,一方面,有效降低了商品的流通成本,提高了整个社会的效率,同时也降低了消费者购买商品和服务的成本;另一方面,一些电子商务平台在经历了血腥残酷的竞争之后,其地位得到了强化和巩固,也逐步暴露出其为了追求利益最大化而不择手段的真实面目,采取了很多排除限制竞争的行为,中小企业和消费者对此有诸多不满,分别从理论和实践两个方面对电商平台价格垄断行为进行研究,系统梳理电商平台典型的价格垄断行为,分析这些行为产生的内因和外因,列举了上述行为对消费者、中小型创新企业、行业、社会和国家的危害,以推进中国《反垄断法》在电商平台的执法进程、维护公平竞争的市场环境、维护消费者权益。 The rapid development of e-commerce,on one hand,has effectively reduced the circulation cost of commodities,increased the whole social efficiency,and reduced the purchasing and service cost,on the other hand,several e-commerce platformswere strengthened and consolidated after severe competition,and thus exposed the essence of pursuing benefit maximization with every mean,adopting a lot of eliminating and restricting competition behaviors,which have resulted in complaints from small-and-medium size enterprises and consumers.This paper theoretically and practically studies the price monopoly behavior of e-commerce platform,systematically combs the typical price monopoly behavior,analyzes the internal and external causes,summarizes the hazard to consumers,small-and-medium size innovative enterprises,industry and society and states to promote the enforcement process of Chinese'Anti-monopoly Law',maintain fair play market environment and protect consumers’rights.
作者 高翔 GAO Xiang(East China University of Political Science and Law Shanghai 200336)
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《价格月刊》 北大核心 2018年第11期32-36,共5页
基金 教育部项目“反垄断法实施的运行机制问题及比较研究”的阶段性研究成果(编号:09YJA820024)
关键词 反垄断法 电商平台 价格垄断 anti-monopoly law e-commerce platform price monopoly
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献49

  • 1刘德良.个人信息的财产权保护[J].法学研究,2007,29(3):80-91. 被引量:329
  • 2Anthony J. Dennis, Most favored nation contract clauses under the antitrust law, University of Dayton Law Review, 821, P.1(1995).
  • 3Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 663 P. Supp. 1360, 899 lZ.2d 951 (10th Cir.).
  • 4U.S.V. Delta Dental oftk.I., 943 F. Supp. 172(D.R..I. 1996).
  • 5Jeffrey L. Kessler, Aldo A. Badini, Susannah P. Torpey, Federal Court Ruling Calls Most-Favored-Nation Clauses into Question by Deeming Ap- ple's Use of MFNs a Per Se Unlawful Violation of the Antitrust Laws, available at http://www.winston.com/en/thought-leadership/federal-court-naling- calls-most-favored-nation-clauses-into-question-by-deeming.html.
  • 6Survey of Morgan Stanley: Booking.com is thrashing Expedia in Europe, data of July, 2013.
  • 7OFT press release 65 / 12 of 31 July 2012, available at http://www.o.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2012/65 - 12.
  • 8The Office of Fair Trading, Hotel online booking:Decision to accept commitments to remove certain discounting restrictions for Online Travel A- gents.
  • 9Online platforms - who can set the price and are most favored nation clauses compatible with competition rules,2014(1),P. 2.
  • 10IoarmisKokkoris,Expedia and Booking.corn: Agent or Distributor, Competition Policy International, 2012, P.1-2.

共引文献142

引证文献3

二级引证文献169

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部