期刊文献+

保护竞争而不保护竞争者?——对主流反垄断法观点的审视 被引量:25

Protecting Competition without Protecting Competitors?——Review on Mainstream Theories of the Anti-Monopoly Law
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 "保护竞争而不是竞争者"被奉为反垄断法的原则。受此影响,我国反垄断法的宗旨中并不包括保护竞争者。"保护竞争而不是竞争者"被误读,通过将其还原到原始文本之中、联系上下文来考察其真正含义后,并不能得出"不保护竞争者"的结论。从反垄断法的价值体系来看,"保护竞争者"和"保护竞争"属于不同层次的价值目标,二者并不矛盾。"保护竞争而不是竞争者"最初在审理企业并购案件中提出,即便在经营者集中制度中适用,也不能任意扩展到反垄断法的其他制度,因为从垄断协议和滥用市场支配地位制度来看,对"竞争者"的保护是其必然要求。 "Protecting competition,not competitors"is regarded as one principle of the Anti-monopoly Law.Under such influence,the Anti-monopoly Law of China does not aim to protect competitors.However,the assertion of"protecting competition,not competitors"has been misunderstood when it is analyzed in the original context,and the conclusion of "not protecting competitors"cannot be reached.In fact,"Protecting competitors"and"protecting competition"are both the aims of the Anti-monopoly Law but at different levels,and they do not contradict with each other.In addition,the principle of "protecting competition,not competitors"derived from the cases of acquisition.Even if this principle can be applied to the rules against Concentration of Business Operators,it should not be arbitrarily expanded to other rules of the Anti-Monopoly Law since"protecting competitors"is the very requirement in rules against monopoly agreements and abuse of dominant market position.
作者 吴宏伟 谭袁
出处 《北方法学》 CSSCI 2013年第4期110-117,共8页 Northern Legal Science
关键词 竞争 竞争者 保护 反垄断法 competition competitors protection Anti-monopoly Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1刘水林.反垄断诉讼的价值定位与制度建构[J].法学研究,2010,32(4):70-85. 被引量:18
  • 2.《马克思恩格斯选集》(第一卷)[M].人民出版社,1972.第25页.
  • 3[德]弗里德里希·卡尔·冯·萨维尼.《历史法学派的基本思想》,郑永流译,法律出版社2009年版,第13页.
  • 4Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, (1962).
  • 5370U. S. 294. "Taken as a whole, the legislative history illuminates congressional concern with the protection of competition, not competitors, and its desire to restrain mergers only to the extent that such combinations may tend to lessen competition.
  • 6370U. S. 294. "Other considerations cited in support of the bill were the desirability of retaining ' local control' over industry and the protec-tion of small businesses. ".
  • 7370U. S. 294. "Congress foresaw that the merger of two large companies or a large and a small company might violate the Clayton Act while the merger of two small companies might not, although the share of the market foreclosed be identical, if the purpose of the small companies is to enable them in combination to compete with larger corporations dominating the market. ".
  • 8370U. S. 294. "It is competition, not competitors, which the Act protects. ".
  • 9370U. S. 294.
  • 10370U. S.294.

二级参考文献12

  • 1郭跃.美国反垄断法价值取向的历史演变[J].美国研究,2005,19(1):77-93. 被引量:32
  • 2行政诉讼法第58条.
  • 3《最高人民法院关于执行(中华人民共和国行政诉讼法)若干问题的解释》第41条第1款.
  • 4“反垄断诉讼研讨会”之《会议纪要》,北京益仁平中心与法律顾问网联合举办,2008年9月20日.
  • 5[日]来生新.《政府与竞争秩序》,《法律时报》(2001年)73卷8号.
  • 6我国反垄断法第38条.
  • 7日本关于禁止私人垄断和确保公平交易的法律第45条.
  • 8加拿大竞争法第9条.
  • 9韩国规制垄断与公平交易法第49条第2、3款.
  • 10刘继峰.我国反垄断私人诉讼制度中的问题及其解决[J].内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,41(2):52-56. 被引量:16

共引文献274

同被引文献436

引证文献25

二级引证文献518

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部