摘要
间接规避著作权保护措施的行为,使著作权脱离著作权人支配和保护的状态,危及著作权人在知识产权市场交易秩序中的垄断地位,严重侵害了其值得刑法保护的法益,应受到刑法规制。著作权保护措施与著作权人基于作品享有的著作权有本质不同,刑法不能适用侵犯著作权罪规制间接规避著作权保护措施行为,该“入口装置”难以实现刑法、民法共治的有效、良好衔接。刑法应增设“规避、破坏技术措施罪”,以此作为著作权法律保护滞后性难题的应对之策。刑法扩张需在合理的限度内进行,强调技术措施的“针对性”“有效性”“营利目的”的主观要素和著作权保护措施的例外情形等,是对适用“规避、破坏技术措施罪”施予的必要限制。
The act of indirectly evading copyright protection measures separates copyright from the state of being controlled and protected by the copyright owner,endangers the monopoly position of the copyright owner in the intellectual property market transaction order,seriously infringes on the legal interests worthy of criminal law protection,and needs to be regulated by criminal law.The copyright protection measures are fundamentally different from the copyright enjoyed by the copyright owner based on the work.The criminal law cannot apply the crime of copyright infringement to regulate indirect evasion of copyright protection measures.This gateway device is difficult to achieve effective and good connection between criminal and civil law.The criminal law should add the crime of"evading and destroying technological measures"as a response to the problem of lagging legal protection of copyright.The expansion of criminal law should be carried out within reasonable limits,emphasizing the"pertinence"and"effectiveness"of technical measures,the subjective elements of profit-making purposes,and exceptions to copyright protection measures,which are necessary limitations imposed on the application of the crime of evading or destroying technical measures.
作者
谷永超
张恒飞
Gu Yongchao;Zhang Hengfei
出处
《电子知识产权》
2024年第11期19-33,共15页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
间接规避
著作权保护措施
“入口装置”
刑民衔接
“规避、破坏技术措施罪”
Indirect Avoidance
Copyright Protection Measures
Entrance Device
Criminal Civilian Integration
Crime of Evading or Disrupting Technical Measures
