摘要
区域科技创新高地建设体现了从经济导向、科技导向,转向强调科学、技术、产业、城市等多制度逻辑协同的发展过程。当前研究主要从区域科技创新体系、区域创新生态、区域创新能力等维度对区域科技创新高地建设的影响因素及其作用机制开展研究,结合城市功能、新型基础设施、可持续发展环境等要素的影响分析及其协同机制研究较少。鉴于此,试图从多重制度逻辑视角建构当前区域科技创新高地建设的响因素,采用动态定性比较分析(qualitative comparative analysis,QCA)方法,揭示科学研究、技术创新、产业发展与城市环境之间各因素相互影响的组态模式,得到推动区域科创高地形成高创新产出的7条组态路径,将其归纳为“科学研究平台与科研主体协同,着力前沿创新型”“技术创新平台与创新环境协同,构筑创新生态型”“技术创新平台与科学研究主体协同,打通产学研创新型”3种模式,同时也发现6条缺乏高创新产出组态路径。
The construction of regional highlands with science and technology innovation orientation reflects the development process from economic orientation,science and technology orientation,transforming to the development process that emphasizes the synergy of multi-system logic such as science,technology,industry and city.Current research mainly focuses on the influencing factors and mechanisms of regional science and technology innovation highlands construction from the dimensions of regional science and technology innovation system,regional innovation ecology,and regional innovation capacity,with less research on the influence of urban functions,new infrastructure,sustainable development environment and their synergistic mechanisms.This paper attempts to construct the influencing factors of the current construction of regional S&T innovation highlands from the perspective of multiple institutional logics.Using the dynamic qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)research method to reveal the configurational patterns of mutual influence among factors such as scientific research,technological innovation,industrial development,and urban environment.It finds that there are 7 group paths to promote the formation of high innovation output in regional S&T innovation highlands,and summarises them into 3 modes:"synergy between scientific research platforms and scientific research subjects,focusing on frontier innovation","synergy between technological innovation platforms and innovation environments,constructing an innovation ecology"and"synergy between technological innovation platforms and scientific research subjects,connecting industry,academia and research innovation".Besides,it also finds 6 paths in the group of lack of high innovation output.
作者
郭雯
赵美玲
Guo Wen;Zhao Meiling(Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;School of Public Policy and Management,UCAS,Beijing 100049,China)
出处
《科技管理研究》
CSSCI
2024年第22期65-74,共10页
Science and Technology Management Research
关键词
科创高地建设
多重制度逻辑
动态QCA分析
construction of science and technology innovation highlands
multiple institutional logics
dynamic qualitative comparative analysis
