摘要
[目的/意义]TOPSIS评价方法作为一种非常重要的评价手段在学术评价中得到广泛的应用,但其系统误差问题一直没有得到关注。[方法/过程]文章将误差理论引入TOPSIS指标体系评价中,在理论分析的基础上,对TOPSIS系统误差的产生机制、检验方法、改进措施进行了深度分析,并以优秀环境科学技术期刊为例进行了相关说明。[结果/结论]研究发现,TOPSIS评价方法系统误差的产生因素是多方面的,包括评价指标选取、TOPSIS方法自身问题、标准化方法选择、权重设置、结果公布等环节;应综合采取措施以降低TOPSIS学术评价的系统误差;实际权重合理性是TOPSIS评价方法系统误差的重要检验方法,系统误差较大的情况要慎重选用该评价方法。
[Purpose/significance]The TOPSIS evaluation method has been widely used in academic evaluation as a very im-portant evaluation method,but its systematic error has not been paid attention to.[Method/process]In this paper,the error theo-ry is introduced into the evaluation of the TOPSIS index system.On the basis of the theoretical analysis,an in-depth analysis of the generation mechanism,inspection methods and improvement measures of the TOPSIS system error is carried out,and relevant ex-planations are given by taking excellent environmental science and technology journals as an example.[Result/conclusion]The study found that there are many factors that cause systematic errors in the TOPSIS evaluation method,including the selection of e-valuation indicators,the problems of the TOPSIS method,the selection of standardized methods,the setting of weights,and the publication of results.Comprehensive measures should be taken to reduce the systematic errors of TOPSIS academic evaluation.The rationality of the actual weight is an important test method for the systematic error of the TOPSIS evaluation method,and this evalu-ation method should be carefully selected when the systematic error is large.
作者
俞立平
杜维
Yu Liping;Du wei(School of Statistics and Mathematics,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Zhejiang Hangzhou 310018)
出处
《情报理论与实践》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第6期11-20,共10页
Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金
浙江省自然科学基金重点项目“制造业从数量型创新向质量型创新转型机制研究”(项目编号:Z21G030004)
浙江省软科学重点项目“浙江省众创空间绩效评价与资源配置研究”(项目编号:2017C25008)
浙江省重点建设高校优势特色学科(浙江工商大学统计学)资助的成果。
关键词
TOPSIS
系统误差
指标选取
标准化
权重设置
方法优化
TOPSIS
systematic error
index selection
standardization
weight setting
method optimization
