期刊文献+

磁共振引导下聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤后子宫内膜损伤及恢复情况 被引量:6

Endometrial Injury and Preservation after Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估磁共振引导下聚焦超声(MRgFUS)治疗子宫肌瘤后发生即刻子宫内膜损伤和3个月后内膜损伤的影响因素。方法回顾性分析2016年8月至2020年10月在北京协和医院妇科筛查、北京万柳美中宜和妇儿医院行MRgFUS的66例子宫肌瘤患者的临床资料,比较治疗后即刻内膜损伤组与未损伤组之间的差异。采用逐步回归法分析治疗后即刻和治疗后3个月子宫内膜损伤的相关因素,Logistic多元回归探讨年龄、治疗前体积、子宫肌瘤是否多发、国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分型、T2WI信号强度、治疗耗时是否是治疗后即刻子宫内膜损伤和3个月后内膜损伤的影响因素。结果66例患者中,41例(62.1%)治疗后即刻子宫内膜无损伤,4例(6.1%)为1级损伤,5例(7.6%)为2级损伤,16例(24.2%)为3级损伤;49例(74.2%)治疗后3个月内无损伤,5例(7.6%)为1级损伤,2例(3.0%)为2级损伤,10例(15.2%)为3级损伤。逐步回归分析结果显示,子宫肌瘤FIGO分型与治疗后即刻子宫内膜损伤(B=-0.121,SE=0.045,β=-0.326,t=-2.670,P=0.010)和3个月后子宫内膜损伤(B=-0.125,SE=0.042,β=-0.375,t=-2.989,P=0.004)显著相关。Logistic多元回归分析结果显示,FIGO分型是治疗后即刻子宫内膜损伤[OR=0.518(0.307~0.873),P=0.014]和3个月子宫内膜损伤[OR=0.456(0.253~0.824),P=0.009]的独立影响因素。结论MRgFUS治疗子宫肌瘤引起的子宫内膜损伤可控,FIGO分型是治疗后即刻子宫内膜损伤与3个月后子宫内膜损伤的独立影响因素。 Objective To explore the risk factors for incident endometrial injury and 3-month endometrial injury after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound(MRgFUS)ablation of uterine fibroids(UF).Methods UF patients who were diagnosed in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and underwent MRgFUS ablation in Amcare Women’s and Children’s Hospital from August 2016 to October 2020 were retrospectively enrolled in this study.Clinical data of 66 UF patients were collected and compared between endometrial injury group and non-injury group.Stepwise regression was employed to determine the risk factors for the incident endometrial injury and 3-month endometrial injury.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship of endometrial injury with age,pre-ablation tumor size,multiple UF,International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO)classification,T2WI signal intensity,and treatment time.Results In terms of incident endometrial injury,the 66 patients included 41(62.1%)cases with no injury,4 cases(6.1%)with grade 1 injury,5 cases(7.6%)with grade 2 injury,and 16 cases(24.2%)with grade 3 injury.In terms of 3-month endometrial injury,the 66 patients included 49 cases(74.2%)with no injury,5 cases(7.6%)with grade 1 injury,2 cases(3.0%)with grade 2 injury,and 10 cases(15.2%)with grade 3 injury.Stepwise regression analysis indicated that FIGO classification was significantly associated with incident endometrial injury(B=-0.121,SE=0.045,β=-0.326,t=-2.670,P=0.010)and 3-month endometrial injury(B=-0.125,SE=0.042,β=-0.375,t=-2.989,P=0.004).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FIGO classification was an independent risk factor for incident endometrial injury[OR=0.518(0.307-0.873),P=0.014]and 3-month endometrial injury[OR=0.456(0.253-0.824),P=0.009].Conclusions Endometrial injury could be controlled after MRgFUS ablation of UF and recover to some extent after 3 months.FIGO classification was an independent risk factor for both incident and 3-month endometrial injury.
作者 叶锦棠 石海峰 苏佰燕 周慷 苏蒙 张羽 张桂芳 金征宇 YE Jintang;SHI Haifeng;SU Baiyan;ZHOU Kang;SU Meng;ZHANG Yu;ZHANG Guifang;JIN Zhengyu(MR Department,Amcare Women’s and Children’s Hospital,Beijing 100089,China;Department of Radiology,PUMC Hospital,CAMS and PUMC,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,PUMC Hospital,CAMS and PUMC,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Epidemiology,the Key laboratory of Geriatrics,Beijing Institute of Geriatrics,National Center of Gerontology,Beijing Hospital,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《中国医学科学院学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第3期414-420,共7页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
关键词 子宫肌瘤 子宫内膜损伤 磁共振 聚焦超声 uterine fibroids endometrial injury magnetic resonance focused ultrasound
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献57

  • 1Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. Lancet,2001,357:293-298.
  • 2Stewart EA, Rabinovici J, Tempany CM, et al. Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steri1,2006 ,85 :22-29.
  • 3Morita Y, Ito N, Hikida H,et al. Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids - early experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2008,139: 199 -203.
  • 4A1 Hilli MM, Stewart EA. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Semin Reprod Med ,2010,28:242-249.
  • 5Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N,et al. The UFS-QOL, a new disease: specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 99 : 290-300.
  • 6Stewart EA, Gostout B, Rabinovici J, et al. Sustained relief of leiomyoma symptoms by using focused ultrasound surgery. Obstet Gynecol, 2007,110 ( 2 Pt 1 ) : 279 -287.
  • 7LeBlang SD, Hoctor K, Steinberg FL. Leiomyoma shrinkage after MRI-guided focused ultrasound treatment: report of 80 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010,194:274-280.
  • 8Okada A, Morita Y, Fukunishi H, et al. Non-invasive magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids in a large Japanese population: impact of the learning curve on patient outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2009,34:579-583.
  • 9Gomy KR, Woodrum DA, Brown DL, et al. Magnetic resonance- guided focused ultrasound of uterine leiomyomas: review of a 12-month outcome of 130 clinical patients. J Vasc lnterv Radiol, 2011,22:857-864.
  • 10Kim HS, Baik JH, Pham LD, et al. MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata: long-term outcomes. Acad Radiol, 2011, 18:970-976.

共引文献58

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部