期刊文献+

宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术对高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变患者妊娠结局的影响 被引量:34

LEEP versus CKC on pregnancy outcome of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)和冷刀锥切术(CKC)两种治疗方式对有生育需求的高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)患者妊娠结局的影响,为临床治疗提供参考。方法回顾性分析十堰市人民医院2015年1月至2018年12月,因高级别CIN接受LEEP术或CKC术后有妊娠意愿患者81例的临床资料。根据手术方式分为LEEP组(41例)及CKC组(40例),统计两种方式治疗后患者妊娠率、流产率、早产率、胎膜早破发生率、低出生体重儿发生率、剖宫产率等指标。结果 LEEP组和CKC组妊娠率比较差异无统计学意义(90.2%vs 87.5%,P>0.05)。LEEP组流产率(16.2%vs 37.1%)、早产率(5.4%vs 25.7%)、低出生体重儿发生率(8.1%vs 28.6%)、剖宫产率(13.5%vs 42.9%)低于CKC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论行CKC术患者流产、早产、低出生体重儿发生率及剖宫产率高于行LEEP术患者。对于有生育要求的高级别CIN患者,可以考虑选择LEEP治疗。 Objective To investigate the effects of cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP)and cervical cold knife conization(CKC)on the pregnancy outcome of patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN)and to provide reference for clinical treatment.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 81 patients with pregnancy intention after LEEP or CKC for high-grade CIN from January 2015 to December 2018.The patients were divided into LEEP group(n=41)and CKC group(n=40)according to the operation methods.The pregnancy rate,abortion rate,premature birth rate,premature rupture of membranes,low birth weight infants,cesarean section rate were analyzed and compared between two groups.Results There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate between LEEP group and CKC group(90.2%vs 87.5%,P>0.05).The incidence of abortion rate(16.2%vs 37.1%),premature birth rate(5.4%vs 25.7%),low birth weight infants rate(8.1%vs 28.6%),and uterine delivery rate(13.5%vs 42.9%)in LEEP group were significantly lower than those in CKC group(P<0.05,P<0.01).Conclusions The incidences of abortion,premature birth,low birth weight and cesarean section in patients with CKC are significantly higher than those in patients with LEEP.For the patients with fertility requirements after being with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,LEEP treatment can be preferred.
作者 李颖颖 张毅 LI Ying-ying;ZHANG Yi(Graduate Training Base of Shiyan People's Hospital,Jinzhou Medical University,Shiyan,Hubei 442000,China;不详)
出处 《中国临床研究》 CAS 2021年第5期624-626,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 宫颈上皮内瘤变 高级别 妊娠结局 宫颈环形电切术 宫颈冷刀锥切术 Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,high-grade Pregnancy outcome Cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure Cervical cold knife conization
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献85

  • 1吴绪峰,曾蓉,高晗,蔡鸿宁.宫颈锥切术后全子宫切除的CINⅢ患者病灶残留相关因素分析[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(6):614-617. 被引量:15
  • 2张燕萍,邓继红,张雯,李文莉,黄蓉霞.宫颈冷刀锥切术在子宫颈疾病诊治中的应用[J].云南医药,2007,28(3):264-266. 被引量:6
  • 3贺豪杰,潘凌亚,黄惠芳,郎景和.宫颈锥切术对宫颈上皮内瘤变患者妊娠及其结局的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(8):515-517. 被引量:43
  • 4Kalliala I,Anttila A,Dyba T,et al.Pregnancy incidence and out-come among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia:a retro-spective cohort study[J].BJOG,2012,119(2):227-235.
  • 5Shanbhag S,Clark H,Timmaraju V,et al.Pregnancy outcome aftertreatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].Obstet Gynecol,2009,114(4):727-735.
  • 6Jakobsson M,Gissler M,Paavonen J,et al.Loop electrosurgical ex-cision procedure and the risk for preterm birth[J].Obstet Gynecol,2009,114(3):504-510.
  • 7Nohr B,Tabor A,Frederiksen K,et al.Loop electrosurgical exci-sion of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery[J].Obstet Gynecol,2009,114(3):511-515.
  • 8Samson S L A,Bentley J R,Fahey T J,et al.The effect of loopelectrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome[J].Obstet Gynecol,2005,105(2):325-332.
  • 9Andia D,de Rosales F M,Villasante A,et al.Pregnancy outcomein patients treated with cervical conization for cervical intraepitheli-al neoplasia[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2011,112(3):225-228.
  • 10Himes K P,Simhan H N.Time from cervical conization to preg-nancy and preterm birth[J].Obstet Gynecol,2007,109(2 Pt 1):314-319.

共引文献92

同被引文献294

引证文献34

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部