摘要
中国学术界从20世纪80年代中期以来就一直致力于构建中国哲学社会科学学科体系,进入21世纪以后,随着中国大国崛起进程的加速,这种情形更加迫切。也正因为如此,学术界各个学科都在尝试对中国哲学社会科学知识体系的再梳理、再挖掘。近年来,政治学界提出的“历史政治学”可以说是这方面的最新成果,而《以中国为方法的政治学》是其中的重要代表。文章强调构建中国政治学理论知识体系必须要去“西方中心主义”,但却陷入“中国中心主义”的泥沼之中。中国政治学理论知识体系的“知识存量”,以及涵盖了中国历史传统政治知识和来自外部且被中国所吸收的其他政治哲学理论知识,都为中国的社会经济发展乃至中国的学术发展作出了重要贡献。撇开这些“知识存量”,而仅仅以“历史基体”来重新构建中国政治学理论知识体系,就有可能陷入“历史决定论”之中。一切知识都来源于社会实践,社会实践是一切知识之源,至于具体在什么国家产生,那是知识之流。因此,知识不在于它产生于何处,而在于谁在使用和为谁服务。
Since the mid-1980s,Chinese academia have been committed to constructing the discipline system of Chinese philosophy and social sciences.However,with the acceleration of the rise of China’s great power in the 21st century,this situation becomes more urgent.Because of this,all academic disciplines are trying to re-comb and re-excavate the knowledge system of Chinese philosophy and social sciences.In recent years,the“historical politics”proposed by the political science circle can be said to be the latest achievement in this field,of which the article Politics With China as the Method is an important representative.That article emphasizes that to construct the theoretical knowledge system of Chinese political science,we must abandon“Western centralism”,but it falls into the mire of“Chinese centralism”at the same time.The“stock of knowledge”of the theoretical knowledge system of Chinese political science,as well as the political knowledge covering Chinese historical tradition,and other theoretical knowledge of political philosophy that comes from outside and absorbed by China,have all made important contributions to China’s social and economic development and even China’s academic development.It is possible to fall into“historical determinism”if we reconstruct the theoretical knowledge system of Chinese political science merely based on historical knowledge and leaving aside these“knowledge stocks”.All knowledge is derived from social practice,which is the source of all knowledge,as to the specific country in which it is produced is the flow of knowledge.Knowledge,therefore,lies not in where it is produced,but in who is using it and serving for.
作者
胡键
HU Jian(Soft Power Research Center,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,Shanghai 200020,China)
出处
《江西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期127-137,共11页
Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“‘一带一路’倡议与提升中国文化软实力研究”(编号:19AKS019)。
