期刊文献+

《穷理学》对亚里士多德“知识”概念的引进 被引量:2

The Introduction of Aristotle's “Επιστμη” Concept in Qinli xue
原文传递
导出
摘要 《穷理学》翻译了亚里士多德关于"知识"概念的理论。傅泛际与李之藻将拉丁文底本的知识"scientia"译为"确知"。但比较亚里士多德原著的对应词"Επιστη'μη"与古汉语"确知"的词源与词义发现,"确知"并不能准确传达"Επιστη'μη"对事物本原和原因解释的内涵及其"证明性"与"必然性"的特征。但"后分析篇"评注的翻译与解释最终将"Επιστη'μη"的内涵与特征赋予"确知"。就此,亚里士多德的"知识"概念被完整引进,这也是西方知识概念第一次引入我国,因而对于传统知识观念与知识体系的丰富与完善有重要意义。 Qinli xue introduce Aristotle'theory of knowledge in Post-Analysis,which is about what is knowledge,how knowledge is acquired and how to ensure its true. Among them,Fu Fanji and Li Zhizao translated the Latin " scientia" as " 确知". By comparing the etymology and the meaning of Greek" Επι'σ τημη" corresponding to " scientia" with the ancient Chinese " 确知",we have found that the Ancient Chinese " 确知" does not accurately convey the original meaning of Aristotle's " Επισ τημη" and the connotative meaning of " Επισ τημη" which Aristotle emphasizes on the origin and reasons of things,nor can it accurately convey the basic characteristics of the " proof" and the " necessity" of " Επιστμη". However,the meaning and characteristics of Aristotle " Επιστμη" are still given the " 确知" through the translation of the commentary part of " post-analysis". This is the first time that westen concept of knowledge has been introduced into our country. The introduction provide a new concept of knowledge for us which is supported by the rational argument. Therefore,it is significant for the enrichment and improvement of traditional knowledge concepts and knowledge systems.
作者 杨爱东 YANG Ai-dong(School of Humanities,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049;School of Marxism,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao,Shandong 266590,China)
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第11期72-78,共7页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 2016年中国博士后科学基金"<穷理学>残抄本的整理与研究"(120103S273) 山东科技大学人才引进科研启动基金"明末清初西方科学与方氏学派关系研究"(2015RCJJ051) 青岛市社科规划基金项目"<穷理学>存本研究"(QDSKL1801136)
关键词 《穷理学》 亚里士多德的“知识”概念 “确知” Qinli xue Aristotle's "Eπστημη" concept "definite knowledge"
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献44

共引文献14

同被引文献3

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部