摘要
传统学说上的错误怀孕之健康/残疾的二分法存在重大缺陷,将孩子出生是否残疾作为赔偿与否的评价标准,忽视了生育自决权价值,是导致损害赔偿责任混乱的根源。错误怀孕损害赔偿的两个"全赔"或"全不赔"的理由都不能成立,应当做精细化区分。堕胎或送养与否的行为是作为或不作为的选择权利而非义务,不应成为医方对抚养费赔偿抗辩的当然理由;关于过失行为引起的抚养费赔偿问题,应在减损规则视域下考察具体情况再予以合理分担。
For ignoring the reproductive self-determination,health/disability dichotomy of wrongful conception on the value of traditional doctrine has major shortcomings.Child's birth disability is the evaluation standard of compensation,which is the root cause of the confusion of liability for damages.Reasons of damages of two all-compensations or non-compensations are unreasonable,which should be made fine distinction.The choice of abortion or adoption behavior is parents' right rather than their obligation.If parents do not choose abortion,doctors should not make it as due reason to defense alimony compensation.The compensation for alimony caused by contributory negligence should be reasonably shared with mitigation rule.
出处
《医学与哲学（A）》
2018年第2期63-67,共5页
Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
基金
2016年教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD820015)
关键词
错误怀孕
减损规则
堕胎
送养
wrongful conception
mitigation of damage
abortion
adoption
