期刊文献+

腹腔镜下阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果对比 被引量:5

Comparison of Effect of Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Open Appendectomy in Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效。方法于2016年5月—2017年7月来该院普外科就诊的急性阑尾炎患者中方便选取选出74例,根据手术方法不同分组,对照组患者行开腹阑尾切除术;观察组患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术。结果观察组患者的手术时间[(40.2±6.50 min vs(39.5±6.80)min]与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在术中出血量[(11.6±2.30)m L vs(24.3±4.20)m L]、术后下床活动时间[(0.84±0.15)d vs(1.26±0.24)d]、肛门排气时间[(0.97±0.19)d vs(1.44±0.28 d)]、进食时间[(1.04±0.13)d vs(1.48±0.25)d]、住院时间[(4.76±0.25)d vs(6.92±0.33)d]指标上,观察组均优于对照组(P<0.01);观察组患者的术后并发症发生率5.41%低于对照组的21.62%(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术用于急性阑尾炎治疗中效果确切,手术的创伤、应激反应小,患者术后恢复较快。 Objective To research the curative effect of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in treatment of acute appendicitis. Methods 74 cases of patients with acute appendicitis diagnosed in our hospital from May 2016 to July2017 were conveniently selected and divided into two groups according to different operation methods, the control group and the observation group were respectively treated with laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy. Results The difference in the operation time between the observation group and the control group was not obvious,[(40.2±6.50)min vs(39.5±6.80)min](P>0.05), and the intraoperative bleeding amount, time to get out of bed after surgery, anal exhaust time, eating time and length of stay in the observation group were better than those in the control group,[(11.6±2.30)m L vs(24.3±4.20)m L,(0.84±0.15)d vs(1.26±0.24)d,(0.97±0.19)d vs(1.44±0.28)d,(1.04±0.13)d vs(1.48±0.25)d,(4.76±0.25)d vs(6.92±0.33)d](P<0.01), and the incidence rate of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(5.41% vs 21.62%)(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of laparoscopic appendectomy in treatment of acute appendicitis is definite with small operation wound and stress reaction, and the recovery of patients is rapid.
作者 郑斐燏
出处 《中外医疗》 2017年第31期65-67,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 开腹阑尾切除术 急性阑尾炎 Laparoscopic appendectomy Open appendectomy Acute appendicitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献98

  • 1包国强.腹腔镜阑尾切除术在小儿外科的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2004,4(5):377-378. 被引量:42
  • 2亓莱滨.李克特量表的统计学分析与模糊综合评判[J].山东科学,2006,19(2):18-23. 被引量:348
  • 3Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. Endoscopy, 1983, 15 (2) : 59 -64.
  • 4Heikkineo TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost - effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study [ J]. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12 (10): 1204-1208.
  • 5Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy [J]. South Med J, 1996, 89 (7): 668-674.
  • 6Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventionsversionS. 1. 0 (updated March 2011) [M/OL]. http : //www. cochrane - handbook. org/.
  • 7Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. Ann Surg, 1994, 219 (6): 725-728.
  • 8Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men [ J ]. World J Surg, 1996, 20 (3): 263-266.
  • 9Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, et al. Laparoscopie versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial [ J]. World J Surg,1996, 20 (1): 17-20.
  • 10Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plewes A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients [ J]. Can J Surg, 1996, 39 (6): 457-462.

共引文献436

同被引文献26

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部