教师教育共同体的学术逻辑与治理模型——以活动理论和治理理论为视角被引量：16

The Academic Logic and Governance Model of Teacher Education Community in Light of Action and Governance Theories

下载PDF

导出

摘要教师教育共同体是我国教育改革深入发展的产物。它重视实践,实现跨界合作,建立大学与中小学伙伴关系,聚焦教育教学活动,实施问题研究,促进教师专业发展,推动中小学教育质量提升和教育公平的落实。活动理论给予教师教育共同体有力的学理支持,治理理论为教师教育共同体管理提供重要的理论支持,在上述两种理论观照下,建立教师教育共同体的善治模型,可为我国教师教育实践与理论提供参考。 The teacher education community is the outcome of Chinese educational development. It emphasizes practice, enables cross-disciplinary cooperation, fosters partnership between universities and primary/secondary schools, focuses on teaching and learning activities, carries out problem-oriented research,promotes teachers ＇ professional development, and bolsters quality and equity of primary and secondary education. Meanwhile,action and governance theories provide adequate theoretical support for research on teacher education community. Building a good governance model of teacher education community will provide a useful reference for the theory and practice of Chinese teacher education.

作者王天晓

机构地区首都师范大学高等教育研究所

出处《首都师范大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期163-171,共9页 Journal of Capital Normal University：Social Science Edition

基金全国教育科学"十二五"规划2013年度教育部重点课题"大学与中小学共建教师专业发展共同体的治理研究"(课题编号:DFA130244)

关键词教师教育共同体活动理论治理理论善治模型 teacher education community action theory governance theory good governance model of teacher education community

分类号 G451.2 [文化科学—教育技术学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1吴刚,洪建中.一种新的学习隐喻:拓展性学习的研究——基于“文化-历史”活动理论视角[J].远程教育杂志,2012,30(3):23-30. 被引量：45
2格里.斯托克,华夏风.作为理论的治理:五个论点[J].国际社会科学杂志（中文版）,1999,16(1):19-30. 被引量：881
3杰瑞.斯托克,楼苏萍,郁建兴.地方治理研究:范式、理论与启示[J].浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2007,37(2):5-15. 被引量：88

二级参考文献45

1Illeris, K. (2011 a). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond [ M ], Beijing: Education science press, 61-62.
2Kuutti, A. (1996). Aetivity theory as a potential framework for hu- man-computer interaction research [J].In B.Anardi (Ed.), context and eonsciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 17-44.
3Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one[J].Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13.
4Lave, J. &Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripher- al participation [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 80.
5Illeris, K. (2011b). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond[M], Beijing: Education science press, 23-29.
6Engestr6m, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010a) Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges[J]. Educational Re- search Review, Vo15, 1-24.
7海伦.瑞恩博德.艾莉森.富勒,安妮.蒙罗著,匡英译.情境中的工作场所学习[M],北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2011:159.
8Engestrom, Y. (2008).From Teams to Knots: Activity Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 100-101.
9Daniels, H. (2001a).Vygotsky and Pedagogy[M]. Routledge Falmer, 94-95.
10Engestrom, Y. (2009).Expansive learning: Toward an activity-theo- retical reconceptualization[J]. In Knud Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning.Routledge press. 51-73.