期刊文献+

表见代理中的被代理人可归责性 被引量:105

Imputability of the Principal in Apparent Agency
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于表见代理,民法总则延续了合同法的规定形式,就表见代理构成中是否要求被代理人的可归责性仍然不清晰。采取积极信赖保护方式的善意取得和表见代理具有结构相似性,可透过善意取得规范抽取出权利外观责任的一般性评价,因此,与善意取得的构成相一致,表见代理的构成中也应包括被代理人的可归责性,且应采取风险归责原则予以解释和具体构建。该原则具有动态综合权衡的特征,为实现确定性可予以具体化。此时应区分不同案例类型,比较权衡行为人的信息成本、被代理人的防免成本、被代理人是否获益、双方的救济成本和商事交易的特性等因素,分别予以实质性论证,将风险归责原则具体化到不同案例类型的规则中。同时,即使被代理人不具有可归责性因此不承担积极信赖保护责任,但其仍可能要承担消极信赖保护责任,以实现法律后果方面的比较权衡。 As to apparent agency, the General Part of Civil Code of PRC still continues the provision mode in the Contract Law, and do not provide clearly whether the elements of apparent agency should include the imputability of the principal. There is a similarity in basic structure between good faith acquisition and apparent agency that adopts the mode of positive protection of reliance. By analyzing the norms on good faith acquisition in the currently effective Chinese laws, a general value judgment in- volved in the responsibility derived from the appearance of right can be extracted. In line with the ele- ments of good faith acquisition, the elements of apparent agency should also include the imputability of the principal, which should be interpreted and constructed according to the principle of risk. This principle has the characteristic of dynamic and integrated balance. In order to lend concreteness to this principle, we should distinguish different types of cases and make substantive argumentation re- spectively, so that definite rules can finally be obtained. In this process, different factors, such as the information cost of the agent, the cost of avoidance of the principal, the profit of the principal, the remedy cost of both parties and the characteristic of commercial transactions, should be balanced. At the same time, even if the principal needs not bear the responsibility of positive protection of reliance because of the absence of his imputability, he may still need to bear the responsibility of negative protection of reliance, so as to realize a balance of legal consequences.
作者 朱虎
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期58-74,共17页 Chinese Journal of Law
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)的项目成果(批准号:15XNI002)
关键词 表见代理 善意取得 信赖保护 可归责性 风险归责 apparent agency, good faith acquisition, protection of reliance, imputability, principle of risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1章戈.表见代理及其适用[J].法学研究,1987,9(6):8-14. 被引量:67
  • 2张双根.占有的基本问题 评《物权法草案》第二十章[J].中外法学,2006,18(1):114-125. 被引量:33
  • 3《合同法》第48条第2款.
  • 4《民法通则》第66条第1款第3句.
  • 5“三明市综合勘察院诉福清市新厝融荣加油站,福清市新厝融辉液化气有限公司案”,福建省福清市人民法院(2001)融经初字第2号,福建省福州市中级人民法院(2001)榕经终字第172号.
  • 6河南省郑州市中级人民法院“河南省中小企业投资担保股份有限公司诉河南汇通集团肉食品股份有限公司等借款担保合同纠纷案”(2010)郑民四初字第17号.
  • 7《中华人民共和国合同法》第402,403条.
  • 8云南省曲靖市中级人民法院“田鸿与云南博林建筑工程有限公司买卖合同纠纷上诉案”(2008)曲中民终字第470号.
  • 9河南省高级人民法院“河南道成实业有限公司与乌托邦解决方案有限公司服务合同纠纷上诉案”(2006)豫法民王终字第64号.
  • 10《第二次代理法重述》第82条.

二级引证文献423

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部