期刊文献+

封闭式负压引流技术与开放植骨对胫骨创伤性骨髓炎的应用实效性评价 被引量:10

Efficacy evaluation of vacuum sealing drainage combined with open bone grafting for tibial traumatic osteomyelitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察并探讨封闭式负压引流术(vacuum sealing drainage,VSD)与开放植骨治疗胫骨创伤性骨髓炎(tibial traumatic osteomyelitis,TTO)的有效性。方法选择2012年6月—2016年3月在浙江萧山医院接受治疗的TTO患者96例,将患者随机分为观察组和对照组2组,各48例。观察组接受VSD^+开放植骨治疗;而对照组先控制感染、修复创面,3~6个月后行二期植骨治疗。统计2组患者的感染控制时间、肉芽覆盖时间、骨折愈合时间,评估2组综合疗效,并统计并发症发生情况。结果观察组感染控制时间、肉芽覆盖时间、骨折愈合时间分别为(13.2±1.7)d、(32.2±7.4)d和(6.3±1.6)个月,对照组为(20.7±2.2)d、(48.8±8.1)d和(8.7±2.0)个月,观察组感染控制时间、肉芽覆盖时间、骨折愈合时间均明显短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组有效率为91.7%(44/48),对照组为77.0%(37/48),观察组有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率为6.3%(3/48),对照组为8.3%(4/48),2组并发症发生率相比,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 VSD联合开放植骨对TTO治疗效果显著,且能明显肉芽覆盖时间和骨折愈合时间,值得在临床上进一步推广。 Objectlve To observe the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage(VSD) combined with open bone grafting for tibial traumatic osteomyelitis (1TO). Methods A total of 96 TTO patients in Xiaoshan hospital from June, 2012 to March,2016 was selected, and the patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group,each with 48 cases. The observation group were treated with VSD combined with open bone grafting;while the control group were treated first with infection control and wound repair, and then treated by second-stage bone grafting after 3 - 6 months. Time of in- fection control, coveting the granulation time, fracture healing time as well as comprehensive efficacy were evaluated and complications were observed and compared between the two groups. Results Time of infection control, coveting the gran- ulation time, fracture healing time was ( 13.2 ±1.7 ) g, ( 32.2 ± 7.4) d and ( 6.3 ± 1.6 ) months in observation group, while the control group was (20.7 ± 2.2) d, (48.8 ± 8.1 ) d and ( 8.7 ± 2.0) months. Time of infection control, coveting the granulation time, fracture healing time was significantly less in observation group than the control group ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; the efficient rate was 91.7% (44/48) in observation group, while 77.0% (37/48) in the control group. The observation group was significantly higher(P 〈 0.05 ) ;complication rate in observation group was 6.3% (3/48), while in the control group was 8.3 % (4/48). The difference was not statistically significant ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion VSD combined with open graft on the 1TO has significant effect, and can cover significantly granulation time and fracture healing time,worthy of further promotion in clinical practice.
出处 《中华全科医学》 2017年第3期443-445,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
关键词 封闭式负压引流术 开放植骨 胫骨创伤性骨髓炎 Vacuum sealing drainage Open bone grafting Tibial traumatic osteomyelitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献76

  • 1王新卫,李勇军,郭建刚,冯峰.游离腓骨移植修复胫骨慢性骨髓炎并长段骨缺损[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2007,21(3):278-281. 被引量:34
  • 2秦泗河.Ilizarov技术与骨科自然重建理念[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(8):595-596. 被引量:42
  • 3郑强,潘志军,李杭,冯刚,陈刚,李建兵,徐建杰.混合式单臂外固定架骨延长术治疗感染性骨不连[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(7):509-513. 被引量:20
  • 4裘华德,宋九宏.负压封闭引流技术[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.22.
  • 5康庆林,张长青,柴益民.Ilizarov技术基本原理及应用[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2012:90-105.
  • 6Eralp L, Kocaoglu M, Rashid H. Reconstruction of segmental bone defects due to chronic osteomyelitis with use of an external fixator and an intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89 Suppl 2 Pt 2: 183-195.
  • 7Jorge LS, Chueire AG, Rossit AR. Osteomyelitis: a current chal- lenge. Braz J Infect Dis, 2010, 14: 310-315.
  • 8Paley D, Maar DC. Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects. J Orthop Trauma, 2000, 14: 76-85.
  • 9Cierny G IV, Zorn KE. Segmental tibia1 defects. Comparing conven- tional and Ilizarov methodologies. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994 (301): 118-123.
  • 10Megas P, Saridis A, Kouzelis A, et al. The treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia following intramedullary nailing by the Ilizarov method. Injury, 2010, 41: 294-299.

共引文献150

同被引文献98

引证文献10

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部