期刊文献+

不同出行方式PM_(2.5)个体暴露水平的比较研究 被引量:6

Comparison of personal exposure to PM_(2.5) by different commuting modes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的在不同浓度大气PM_(2.5)水平下,比较不同出行方式的PM_(2.5)个体暴露水平,并进一步比较地铁站不同位置的PM_(2.5)浓度,以期为城市居民选择适宜的出行方式提供科学依据。方法于2015年12月30日至2016年1月4日,选择北京市城区的某条路线作为研究地点,使用便携式PM_(2.5)监测仪同时测量步行、乘坐公交车和地铁3种出行方式的PM_(2.5)个体暴露水平;对地铁站台、安检处和地铁车厢内的PM_(2.5)浓度进行同步监测并比较。结果在同一研究时期,步行、乘坐公交车和地铁测得的PM_(2.5)个体暴露浓度均值分别为219.34、209.61、167.56μg/m3。当大气PM_(2.5)浓度较低时(≤60μg/m3),乘坐地铁的PM_(2.5)个体暴露水平高于步行和乘坐公交车;当大气PM_(2.5)浓度较高时(>100μg/m3),乘坐地铁的个体PM_(2.5)暴露水平明显低于步行和公交车,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。监测期间地铁站台、安检处和车厢内的PM_(2.5)浓度均值分别为196.90、170.20、136.82μg/m3。结论在不同的大气PM_(2.5)污染水平下,不同出行方式的人群PM_(2.5)个体暴露水平不同。 Objective To compare personal exposure to air particulate matter(PM_(2.5)) by three commuting modes under different levels of ambient PM_(2.5). Furthermore, PM_(2.5)concentrations at three places in subway station were compared. Methods A route at urban area in Beijing was chosen. Personal PM_(2.5)exposures by three commuting modes including walking, bus and subway were measured at the same time by using portable PM_(2.5)monitors, between December 30, 2015 and January 4, 2016. PM_(2.5)concentrations at three places in subway station, including security checkpoint, platform and subway car were measured and compared. Results During the same study period, means of personal PM_(2.5)exposures were 219.34 μg/m3, 209.61 μg/m3and167.56 μg/m3 for walking, bus and subway respectively. Further comparison showed that subway commuter had higher exposure compared with walker and bus commuter under low ambient PM_(2.5)concentration(≤60 μg/m3); While subway commuter had the lowest exposure under high ambient PM_(2.5)concentration(〉100 μg/m3). During the study period, means of PM_(2.5)concentrations were 196.90 μg/m3, 170.20 μg/m3, 136.82 μg/m3 at platform, security checkpoint and subway car respectively. Conclusion Commuters using three transport modes have different personal PM_(2.5)exposure under different ambient PM_(2.5)concentrations.These results will be helpful for citizens to choose commuting mode scientifically.
出处 《环境与健康杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第8期659-662,共4页 Journal of Environment and Health
基金 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划(91543112) 中华医学基金会项目(CMB 15-228)
关键词 PM2.5 个体暴露 出行方式 交通 PM2.5 Personal exposure Commuting mode Transportation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Farmer SA, Nelin TD, Falvo M J, et al. Ambient and household air pollution :complex triggers of disease [J ]. Am J Physiol Heart Cire Physiol,2014,307:467-476.
  • 2Peters A, Klot S, Heier M, et al. Exposnre to traffic and the onset of myocardial infarction[J].N Engl J Med, 2004,351:1721-1730.
  • 3Adams HS, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Colvile RN, et al. Fine particle (PMzs) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London,UK[J]. Sei Total Environ, 2001,279:29-44.
  • 4Ministry of Environmental Protection ot" the People's Republic of China.Chinese Crowd Behavior Patterns of Enviromnental Exposure Study Report (Adult Volumes)[M].China Environmental Science Press, 2013.
  • 5Huang J, Deng FR, Wu SW,et al. Comparisons of personal exposure to PMzs and CO by different commuting modes in Beijing,China[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2012,425:52-59.
  • 6Suarez L, Mesias S, Iqlesias V, et ah Personal exposure to particulate matter in conunuters using different trausport modes (bus, tricycle, car and subway) in an assigned route in downtown Santiago, Chile [J]. Environ Sci Process hnpacts, 2014,16:1309-1317.
  • 7Vania M,Teresa M,Lufs M,et al.Faetors controlling air quality in different European subway systems [ J ].Environ Res,2016,146:35-46.
  • 8李路野,樊越胜,谢伟,司鹏飞,侯文生.西安市地铁环境中大气颗粒物污染现状调查[J].环境与健康杂志,2013,30(2):160-161. 被引量:6
  • 9樊越胜,胡泽源,刘亮,谢伟,艾帅.西安地铁环境中PM_(10)、PM_(2.5)、CO_2污染水平分析[J].环境工程,2014,32(5):120-124. 被引量:24
  • 10王占山,李云婷,陈添,张大伟,孙峰,潘丽波.2013年北京市PM_(2.5)的时空分布[J].地理学报,2015,70(1):110-120. 被引量:205

二级参考文献85

共引文献238

同被引文献36

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部