摘要
虽然专利挟持问题在我国尚不突出,但巨大的市场已为专利挟持的滋生提供了肥沃的土壤。在美国,专利挟持已成为阻碍创新的重要因素,美国法院在e Bay案中首次确立以衡平法的"四要素检验标准"来决定是否颁发禁令,以此处理专利挟持问题。但"四要素检验标准"在实践应用中的可操作性不强。通过对e Bay案后国外法院相关案件判决进行对比分析,提炼出了拒发禁令的通用经验规则,以期对我国专利挟持的规制模式研究提供帮助。
It has not been paid much attention to the problem of patent holdup, but the Chinese wide space of market has provides a favorable environment for the phenomenon of patent holdup. In America, the phenomenon of patent holdup becomes important factor to impeded innovation. American court first adopted the equity with the four-factor test to decide whether to issue the permanent injunction, to deal the problem of patent holdup with injunction rejection. However, the four-factor test is not strong operability in the practical application. Through the study of the empirical analysis of foreign related cases after e Bay, the article extracted some experience rules which are related to the injunction rejection, to supply the help of the research of regulation of patent holdup in our country.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2016年第8期53-63,共11页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
专利挟持
禁令
规制
专利渔翁
Patent Holdup
Injunction
Regulation
Patent Trolls
