期刊文献+

泥壁和石壁窖池糟醅风味物质的差异研究 被引量:1

Comparison of flavor substances in fermented grains from mud-wall and stone-wall pits
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用乙醇和水浸提法结合气相色谱法检测对泥壁窖和石壁窖两种建窖方式糟醅的风味物质进行分析研究。结果表明,使用乙醇提取糟醅的风味物质总含量(8.912 5 g/L)高于水提取法(6.372 6 g/L)且变异系数低;使用乙醇浸提糟醅风味物质结果表明,泥壁下层糟醅的已酸乙酯含量(0.021 0 g/L)显著高于窖池其他部位糟醅,泥壁糟醅的乳酸乙酯含量(0.118 3 g/L)显著低于石壁糟醅。酸类含量以乙酸含量(1.484 2 g/L)最高。因此,在生产浓香型酒时,窖池使用泥壁窖优于石壁窖。 The flavor substances in fermented grains fxom mud-wall pits and stone-wall pits were studied by ethanol extraction and water extraction methods. Results showed that the total content of flavor substances in fermented grains by ethanol extraction (8.912 5 g/L) was higher than that by water extraction (6.372 6 g/L) and the coefficient of variation was lower. After ethanol extraction, the content of ethyl hexylate in fermented grains from mud-wall pits in lower levels (0.021 0 g/L) was significantly higher than that from other parts of pits, and the content of ethyl lactate in fermented grains from mud-wall pits (0.118 3 g/L) was significantly lower than that in fermented grains from stone-wall pits. The content of acetic acid (1.484 2 g/L) was the highest in acids. Therefore, in the production of Luzhou-flavor liquor, mud-wall pit was superior to stone-wall pit.
出处 《中国酿造》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第10期95-97,共3页 China Brewing
基金 四川省财政创新能力提升工程专项基金(2013xxxk-018)
关键词 浓香型酒 建窖 糟醅 风味物质 Luzhou-flavor liquor pit construction fermented grains flavor compound
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献180

共引文献211

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部