期刊文献+

方庄社区卫生服务中心分时预约就诊模式的实施效果研究 被引量:10

Practice Effect of Timeshare Appointment Treatment Model in Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解方庄社区卫生服务中心分时预约就诊模式的实施效果。方法分别选取2012年4月—2013年4月、2013年5月—2014年5月方庄社区卫生服务中心全科候诊区分时预约就诊实施前后患者各1 500例,对其实施前后满意度、挂号和候诊时间进行对比分析。结果实施前后分别回收有效问卷1 250、1 276份,有效回收率为83.33%、85.07%。实施前后患者对诊疗环境、诊疗时间、医患沟通充分、病情熟悉程度、候诊时间的满意度评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。综合满意率由实施前的89.12%(1 114/1 250)上升为实施后的97.26%(1 241/1 276),差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.18,P<0.01)。实施后患者挂号、候诊时间较实施前均缩短〔(7.3±1.6)min比(26.0±1.8)min、(8.7±2.1)min比(29.9±4.4)min〕,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论分时预约就诊模式对优化门诊就诊流程、缩短患者非医疗等候时间、提高患者满意度发挥重要作用。分时就诊、有序就医的门诊建设思路得以初步体现。 Objective To explore the practice effect of timeshare appointment treatment model in Fangzhuang community health service center. Methods Prior to the implementation of timeshare appointment treatment model, 1500 patients in general practice waiting area of Fangzhuang community health service center from April 2012 to April 2013 were selected as study subjects; after the implementation of timeshare appointment treatment model, another 1 500 patients in general practice waiting area of Fangzhuang community health service center from May 2013 to May 2014 were also selected as study subjects. The satisfaction degree of patients, waiting time for registration and waiting time for doctors were compared between two groups. Results Prior to the implementation of timeshare appointment treatment model, there were 1 250 effective questionnaires with a valid return rate of 83.33% ; after the implementation of timeshare appointment treatment model, there were 1 276 effective questionnaires with a valid return rate of 85.07%. There were significant differences in patients' satisfaction score for environment of diagnosis and treatment, time of diagnosis and treatment, doctor- patient communication, doctors' familiarity with illness and waiting time for doctors between two groups (P 〈 0. 05 ) . Comprehensive satisfaction rate before the implementation of timeshare appointment treatment model [ 89. 12% ( 1 114/1 250 ) ] was significantly lower than that [ 97. 26% ( 1 241/1 276) ] after the implementation of timeshare appointment treatment model (X2 = 12.18, P 〈 0.01 ) . The waiting time for registration and waiting time for doctors after the implementation of timeshare appointment treatment model were significantly shorter than those before the implementation of timeshare appointment treatment model, respectively [ (7. 3 ±1.6) minvs. (26.0±1.8) min, (8.7 ±2.1) min vs. (29.9 ±4.4) min, both P〈0.05] .Conclusion The timeshare appointment treatment model plays an important role on optimizing the outpatient service process, shortening the waiting time of patients, and improving patients' satisfaction. The idea of the constructing outpatient about timeshare appointment treatment and orderly treatment has achieved initial results.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期466-468,共3页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 社区卫生服务 分时预约就诊模式 实施效果 Community health services Timeshare appointment treatment model Practice effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

共引文献40

同被引文献87

  • 1马亚楠,何钦成.社区全科医生首诊制是实现双向转诊制的有效途径[J].中国卫生经济,2007,26(3):27-29. 被引量:50
  • 2Okihiro M, Pillen M, Ancog C, et al.Implementing the obesity care model at a community health center in Hawaii to address child hood obesity[J].Journal of health care for the poor and under served, 2013,24 (20) : 1 - 6.
  • 3Axelrad J E,Mimiaga MJ,Grasso C,et al.Trends in the spectrum of engagement in HIV care and subsequent clinical outcomes a mong men who have sex with men (MSM) at a Boston community health center[J].AIDS Patient Care STDS,2013,27(5) : 287 - 296.
  • 4Zuckerman KE,Perrin JM, Hobrecker K,et al.Barriers to specialty care and specialty referral completion in the community health center setting[J]. The Journal of Pediatrics, 2013,162 ( 2 ) : 409 - 414.
  • 5Reisner SL,Falb KL,Wagenen AV,et al. Sexual orientation dis parities in substance misuse: the role of cbildhood abuse and inti mate partner violence among patients in care at an urban corllnlu nity health center[J].Substance use & misuse,2013,48(3) : 274 289.
  • 6Neuhausen K, Grumbach K, Bazemore A,et al. Integrating corn munity health centers into organized delivery systems can improve access to subspeciahy care[J].Health Affairs,2012,31(8) : 1708 -1716.
  • 7Silva M,Cashman S, Kunte P, et al.Improving population health through integration of primary care and public health: Providing access to physical activity for community health center patients [J].American Journal of Public Health,2012,10201) :56 - 61.
  • 8谢宇,代涛,朱坤,栗成强.南京市社区居民社区首诊意愿及影响因素研究[J].中国全科医学,2010,13(15):1621-1624. 被引量:36
  • 9孙伟,郑家萍,康蓓蓓.社区卫生服务中心非在编护理人员流失的相关因素分析与对策[J].护士进修杂志,2011,26(2):174-176. 被引量:2
  • 10吴雯.社区卫生服务中心试行预约门诊的实践与探讨[J].中国初级卫生保健,2011,25(6):7-9. 被引量:13

引证文献10

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部