期刊文献+

我国科研人员对机构知识库认知与使用的现状调查与分析 被引量:18

Survey and Analysis on Cognition and Using of Institutional Repository for China Mainland Researchers
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】了解国内科研人员对IR的认知和向IR呈缴科研成果的态度、条件与期望。【方法】聚焦"存缴者"用户群体,以国内教育与科研机构科研人员为对象,通过定额抽样方法,从60多家单位的1 500余名科研人员获取调查数据。采用SPSS分析调查数据的信度和效度,并进行数据分析。【结果】掌握了此次调查范围内国内科研与教育人员对IR的认知和向IR存缴学术成果的态度、条件和期望;基于调查数据,发现专业研究机构和高校两类机构的科研人员在存缴态度、方式和条件等方面存在部分差异。【局限】总体调查规模有限,特别是高校用户样本较少。调查结论基于所获得的调查数据,未必适用于更广泛的用户群体。【结论】调查基本达到预期成效,针对调查结果,提出推进中国IR实践、提升IR成果应用的思考。 [Objective] Understanding concepts on IR of China Mainland researchers, and their attitudes, conditions and expectation for submitting and storing their research productions to IR. [Methods] Focusing on "submit role" users, the paper takes the researchers of educational & research institutions as survey object, obtains survey data from more than I 500 researchers of 60 institutions by quota sampling method. And uses SPSS for reliability and validity analysis, and makes data analysis according to the survey objectives. [Results] Obtaining concepts on IR of China Mainland researchers, and their attitudes, conditions and expectation for submitting and storing their research productions to IR. Also, based on the data, discovering usage and concepts differences between research institutions and universities communities. [Limitations] There is small percentage of users from universities, and as far as the national scitifitic institutions and university communities, it needs more data to support the survey. The findings are just based on the survey data, they may not be applicable to a wider range of user groups. [Conclusions] The survey achieves its desired results, and according to the survey data, it brings out suggestions on promoting IR practice and enhancing IR applications.
出处 《现代图书情报技术》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期8-16,共9页 New Technology of Library and Information Service
关键词 机构知识库 用户调查 使用认知 中国 科研人员 Institutional Repository(IR) User survey Usage congnition China Researchers
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Lynch C A. Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age[R/OL]. ARL Bimonthly Report, 2003(226): 1-7. [2013-10-26]. http://www.arl.org/ resources/pubs/br/br226/br226ir, shtml.
  • 2Crow R. The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper[R/OL]. ARL Bimonthly Report , 2002 (223). [2013-10-26]. http://works.bepress, com/ir research/7.
  • 3Shearer K. Institutional Repositories: Towards the Identi- fication of Critical Success Factors[J]. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 2003, 27(3): 89-108.
  • 4Ezema I J. Local Contents and the Development of Open Access Institutional Repositories in Nigeria University Libraries Challenges, Strategies and Scholarly Implications [J]. Library Hi Tech, 2013, 31(2): 323-340.
  • 5钟灿涛,董成文,季燕江.开放获取对大学的影响及应对措施研究[J].研究与发展管理,2010,22(4):120-126. 被引量:8
  • 6Proportion of Repositories by Country-Worldwide[EB/OL]. [2013-10-30]. http://www.opendoar, org,.
  • 7Lynch C A, Lippincott J K. Institutional Repository Deployment in the United States as of Early 2005[J]. D-Lib Magazine, 2005, 11(9): 5.
  • 8Markey K, Rieh S Y, Jean B S, et al. Census of Institutional Repositories in the United States: MIRACLE Project Research Findings[OL]. [2013-10-26]. http://www.clir.org/ pubs/abstract/reports/pub140.
  • 9李麟.我国科研人员对科技信息开放获取的态度——以中国科学院科研人员为例[J].图书情报工作,2006,50(7):34-38. 被引量:57
  • 10何燕.我国科研人员潜在自存储行为影响因素研究——以中国科学院科研人员为例[J].图书馆,2008(3):32-35. 被引量:14

二级参考文献87

共引文献223

同被引文献346

引证文献18

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部