期刊文献+

环境规制下政府与企业环境行为的动态博弈与最优策略研究 被引量:73

Research on Dynamic Game between Government and Corporation Environmental Behavior and Optimal Strategies Based on Environmental Regulation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着工业化的快速发展,严峻的环境污染问题日益凸显,政府环境规制成为社会性规制的重要内容。本文基于规制经济学,以及规制过程中的博弈研究基础,采用博弈论分析方法,研究了政府实施排污税环境规制下企业与政府之间的博弈关系。通过构建博弈模型分析认为,政府的排污税率、谎报罚金等指标以及企业自身的排污技术水平、排污谎报带来的声誉损失影响企业污染上报量、环境治理等环境策略,但是监管强度并不能直接影响企业的排污水平。因此应通过完善环境规制政策、激励企业技术创新以积极开展污染治理工作,提高环境规制效率。 With the rapid development of industrialization, environmental pollution problem is getting worse. Environ- mental pollution regulation is an important part of the social regulation. Based on Regulatory Economics, environmental regulation and game analysis, the paper studies game between government and enterprise when government choosing emission tax as environmental regulation measure. By constructing a game model,the result indicates that: emission tax rate, penahy of enterprise violations, and green technology and reputation losses of company have effects on enterprise' s environmental strategy including reported pollution quantity and environment management, while different environmental regulation cannot affect enterprise' s pollution level directly. Therefore, improving the social responsibility consciousness, perfecting the environment regulation policy, inspiring technology innovation incentive is required to carry out pollution control work actively, and to enhance our country' s environmental regulation efficiency.
作者 张倩 曲世友
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期35-40,共6页 Forecasting
基金 黑龙江省自然科学基金资助项目(G201131) 黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(12E037)
关键词 环境规制 企业环境行为 动态博弈 最优策略 技术创新 environmental regulation corporation environmental behavior dynamic game optimal strategies technology innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Weitzman M L. Prices vs quantities [ J ]. Review of Eco-nomic Study, 1974,41(4) : 477-491.
  • 2Stavins R. What can we learn from the grand policyexperiment. Lessons from the S02 allowance trading [ J ].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, 12(3) : 69-88.
  • 3Arimura T. An empirical study of the S02 allowance market :effects of PUC regulations [ J ]. Journal of EnvironmentalEconomics and Management, 2002, 44(2) : 271-289.
  • 4Harford J D. Firm behavior under imperfectly enforceablepollution standards and taxes[ J]. Journal of EnvironmentalEconomics and Management, 1978, (5) : 26-43.
  • 5Sandmo A. Efficient environmental policy with imperfectcompliance [ J ]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2002,23(1): 85-103.
  • 6王克稳.论我国环境管制制度的革新[J].政治与法律,2006(6):15-21. 被引量:18
  • 7张倩.环境管制与煤炭企业竞争力关系的理论研究[J].资源开发与市场,2013,29(3):303-306. 被引量:14
  • 8Carroll A B. A three-dimensional conceptual model ofcorporate social performance [ J ]. Academy of Manage-ment Review, 1979,(4) : 497-505.
  • 9Freeman R E. Strategic management: a stakeholderapproach [ M ]. Boston, MA : Pitman, 1984.
  • 10Delmas M. The diffusion of environmental standards inEurope and in the United States : an institutional per-spective[ J]. Policy Science, 2002 , 35: 91-119.

二级参考文献206

共引文献509

同被引文献838

引证文献73

二级引证文献794

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部