摘要
本文首先分析了刑罚理论上的绝对主义 (报应刑论 )、相对主义 (目的刑论 )与并合主义的内涵 ,指出报应刑论与目的刑论的分歧不在于刑罚目的 ,而在于刑罚正当化的根据 ,提出并合主义是理想的刑罚观念 ;其次论证新刑法采取了并合主义 ,认为这样有利于同时保护个人与社会利益 ,有利于适当处理刑罚积极主义与消极主义的关系 ,有利于协调罪刑均衡与刑罚个别化原则 ,有利于使刑罚整体程度适中 ;接着根据并合主义的理念提出刑罚与社会危害性、人身危险性相适应的具体要求 ,主张量刑时不宜过于重视一般预防的需要 ;最后联系中国国情与公民的一般价值观念 ,根据刑罚的本质 ,指出我国目前的刑罚虽然不宜过于严厉 。
This article makes, first of all, the implications of absolutism (retribution), relativism (prevention) and comprehension in the theory of criminal punishment. It points out that the difference between the theory of retribution and the theory of prevention does not lie in the aim of punishment, but in the grounds of proper punishment, and therefore holds the theory of comprehension is the ideal concept of punishment. It then demonstrates that the new criminal law adopts the theory of comprehension, which helps protect individual rights and social interests, handle the relationships between penal activism and penal passivism, coordinate suiting punishment to crime and individualization of punishment, and bring about appropriate punishment as a whole. The article proceeds to put forward, based on the concept of comprehension, specific punishments for offenses against society and personal safety, and argues against overstress on the need for prevention. Finally, in the light of the Chinese national conditions and the values of Chinese citizens and taking into account the nature of punishment, the article expounds that punishment in present China should neither be too severe nor too lenient.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2000年第1期103-113,共11页
Social Sciences in China
