期刊文献+

反社会行为始于青少年期和儿童期的暴力犯罪青少年童年受虐史、攻击行为的差异比较 被引量:5

Childhood abuse and aggressive behavior in violent adolescent criminals with adolescence-vs children-onset antisocial behavior
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较反社会行为始于青少年期(adolescence-onset,AO)和始于儿童期(children-onset,CO)的暴力犯罪青少年童年受虐史、攻击行为差异;探索AO与CO攻击行为与受虐的关系。方法选取14~18岁男性暴力犯罪青少年AO、CO各110例,选取14~18岁110例普通男性学生作为对照,采用一般情况问卷、儿童虐待问卷、忽视问卷、攻击问卷进行横断面调查研究。结果父母不良嗜好、社会风气、父母婚姻及关系、父母教育程度等家庭社会环境因素3组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);儿童期受虐、被忽视各因子及总分3组差异有统计学意义(F=86.524、F=70.754,P<0.01),且AO组交流及躯体忽视得分高于CO组和对照组(P<0.05),AO组和CO组性虐待、虐待总分高于对照组(P<0.05);攻击各因子及总分:CO组>AO组>对照组,差异有统计学意义(F=24.887,P<0.01);AO组、CO组攻击行为与童年虐待均呈显著正相关(rAO=0.44、rCO=0.78,P<0.01)。结论 AO较CO暴力犯罪青少年童年期家庭社会环境更差,童年受虐、被忽视程度更严重,但CO暴力犯罪青少年攻击行为更强,提示未来对青少年暴力犯罪的干预需根据其类型特征采取不同措施。 Objective To investigate the differences of childhood abuse, neglect and aggressive behavior between violent adolescent criminals with adolescence- (AO) and children-onset (CO) antisocial behavior, and to explore the relationship of aggressive behavior between AO and CO with being abused. Methods One hundred and ten AO and 110 CO violent adolescent criminals (all males, with an age ranging from 14 to 18) were selected from Chongqing juvenile prison. Another 110 male students at the same age range from an occupation high school served as control. All of them were assessed with the self-made general situation questionnaire, childhood trauma questionnaire-28-item short-form (CTQ-SF), aggression questionnaire (AQ) and child neglected scale to cross-sectional survey research. Results .There were significant differences in the bad habits of parents, dwelling environment, customs, parental rearing styles, and marital status among the 3 groups(P 〈0.01 ). Very statistical differences were found in the childhood abuse, neglect and total score a- mong the 3 groups(F = 86. 524, F = 70. 754, P 〈 0.01 ). The communication and body ignore was higher in the AO group than CO and control groups (P 〈 0.05 ), yet the sexual abuse and abuse total score were higher in the AO and CO groups than control (P 〈 0.05 ). There were significant differences in the aggressive behav- iors among the 3 groups (F =24. 887, P 〈0.01 ), in an order of CO group 〉 AO group 〉 control. There was positive correlation between aggressive behaviors and childhood abuse both in the AO and CO groups (r_AO = 0. 44, r_CO =0.78, P 〈0.01). Conclusion AO group has worse childhood family, social environment, abuse and neglect compared with CO group, but CO group has stronger aggressive behavior. Our results indicate that different measurement should be taken according to the characteristics of different groups of violent criminals in future intervention.
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第24期2511-2514,共4页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
基金 重庆市科学技术协会决策咨询课题(渝科协学文[2011]14号)~~
关键词 攻击行为 虐待 忽视 犯罪 青少年 aggressive behavior abuse neglect crime adolescent
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Moffitt T E. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocialbehavior: a developmental taxonomy [ J]. Psychol Rev, 1993, 100(4): 674-701.
  • 2Moffitt T E, Caspi A, Dickson N, et al. Childhood-onset versus ado-lescent-onset antisocial conduct problems in males : natural history fromages 3 to 18 years[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 1996 , 8(2) : 399 -424.
  • 3Walters G D. The latent structure of life-course-persistent antisocial be-havior :is Moffitt , s developmental taxonomy a true taxonomy. [ J]. JConsult Clin Psycholt 2011, 79(1): 96 -105.
  • 4Thombs B D, Bernstein D P, Lobbestael J, et al. A validation study ofthe Dutch Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form: factor struc-ture ,reliability, and known-groups validity [ J]. Child Abuse Negl,2009,33(8) : 518 -523.
  • 5张敏.中文版儿童期虐待问卷信度及效度评价[J].中国公共卫生,2011,27(5):669-670. 被引量:49
  • 6杨世昌,杜爱玲,张亚林,王芙蓉,郭果毅.儿童被忽视量表在湘潭地区871名儿童中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2007,21(12):819-821. 被引量:14
  • 7Burt S A,Donnellan M B, Iacono W G, et al. Age-of-onset or behav-ioral sub-types. A prospective comparison of two approaches to charac-terizing the heterogeneity within antisocial behavior [ J]. J AbnormChild Psychol, 2011,39(5) : 633 -644.
  • 8Lahey B B, Van-Hulle C A, Waldman ID, et al. Testing descriptivehypotheses regarding sex differences in the development of conductproblems and delinquency [ J]. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 2006 , 34(5): 737 - 755.
  • 9杨林,杨德兰.暴力人群的家庭环境对照研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2007,32(6):629-631. 被引量:9
  • 10顾璇,姚荣英.交往焦虑与中学生攻击行为的相关性研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2011,33(19):2091-2092. 被引量:12

二级参考文献41

  • 1杨世昌,张亚林,黄国平,郭果毅.受虐儿童个性特征初探[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(9):617-618. 被引量:19
  • 2杨世昌,张亚林.儿童虐待与精神卫生[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2004,10(4):303-304. 被引量:12
  • 3潘建平,李玉凤.儿童忽视研究的最新进展[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(5):378-381. 被引量:47
  • 4赵幸福,张亚林,李龙飞,周云飞,李鹤展,杨世昌.中文版儿童期虐待问卷的信度和效度[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(20):105-107. 被引量:361
  • 5邹韶红,张亚林,张勇,黄国平,柳娜,刘婷.儿童期虐待与亲密伴侣暴力关系[J].中国公共卫生,2007,23(2):181-182. 被引量:16
  • 6Soloff PH, Lynch KG, Kelly TM. Childhood abuse as a risk factor for suicide behavior in borderline personality disorder [J].J Personal Disorder,2002,16 ( 3 ) : 201 - 214.
  • 7Paivio SC ,Cramer KM. Factor structure and reliability of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in a Canadian undergraduate student sample [ J ]. Child Abuse and Neglect,2004,28 ( 8 ) :889 - 904.
  • 8Carmella R, Perry A, Christopher J. Instruments for the assessment of childhood trauma in adults - J ]. J Nerv Ment Dis, 2004, 192 (5) :343 -351.
  • 9Christine D, Murray B, Gordon J, et al. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in a community sample:psychometric properties and normative data [J]. Journal Trauma Stress, 2001,14 ( 4 ) : 843 - 857.
  • 10Wittchen H U, Fuetsch M, Sonntag H, et al. Disability and quality of life in pure and comorbid social phobia--findings from a controlled study [J]. Eur Psychiatry, 1999, 14(3) : 118 - 131.

共引文献80

同被引文献85

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部