期刊文献+

两种脑脊液置换术对蛛网膜下腔出血迟发性血管痉挛的防治作用 被引量:14

Effects of two cerebrospinal fluid drainage methods on prevention and treatment of delayed vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrage
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较持续腰大池引流和腰椎穿刺脑脊液置换术对蛛网膜下腔出血迟发性血管痉挛的防治作用。方法选择蛛网膜下腔出血患者46例,随机分为2组:A组24例,持续腰大池引流,B组22例,腰椎穿刺脑脊液置换术。行经颅多普勒检查比较介入治疗后1、7、14、21、28 d的血管痉挛情况,血管痉挛用大脑中动脉平均流速(MCAVm)及Lingdegaard指数表示,并统计2种脑脊液置换术的不良反应。结果 2组患者血管痉挛程度在介入治疗后1 d无明显差异,A组患者在介入后7、14 d MCAVm及Lingdegaard指数明显低于B组[(103.89±29.61)cm/s vs(134.31±30.17)cm/s,(1.701±0.670)vs(1.943±0.711),P<0.05;(99.27±20.11)cm/s vs(111.49±27.45),(1.569±0.487)vs(1.858±0.736),P<0.05],介入治疗后21 d差异不明显(P>0.05)。2组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。结论介入治疗后14 d内,持续腰大池引流对于改善血管痉挛情况优于腰椎穿刺脑脊液置换,21 d后则不明显。2种方法的不良反应接近。 Objective To compare the effects of continuous lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CLCFD) and lumbar puncture cerebrospinal fluid replaeement(LPCFR) on prevention and treat- ment of delayed vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH). Methods Forty-six SAH pa- tiants were randomly divided into CLCFD group (group A, n = 24) and LPCFR group(group B, n= 22). The patients underwent transcranial Doppler examination on days 1,7,14,21,28 after in- tervention therapy. Vasospasm was expressed as the mean velocity of middle cerebral artery (MCAVm) and the Lingdegaard index. Adverse effects of the two replacement methods were re- corded. Results No significant difference was found in vasospasm between the two groups on day 1 after intervention therapy. The MCAVm and Lingdegaard index were significantly lower in group A than in group B on days 7 and 14 after intervention therapy(103.89±29.61 cm/s vs 134. 31±30.17 cm/s,1. 701±0. 670 vs 1. 943±0. 711,P±0. 05;99. 27±20.11 cm/s vs 111.49± 27.45 cm/s, 1. 569 ± 0. 487 vs 1. 858 ± 0. 736, P〈0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups on day 21 after intervention therapy. No significant difference was found in adverse effects of the two replacement methods between the two groups. Conclusion The effect of CLCFD is better than that of LPCFR on delayed vasospasm on day 14 after inter- vention therapy, but its effect is not noticeable on day 21 after intervention therapy. The adverse elects of the two methods are similar.
出处 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第11期1176-1178,共3页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart,Brain and Vessel Diseases
关键词 蛛网膜下腔出血 引流术 脊椎穿刺 血管痉挛 颅内 subarachnoid hemorrhage drainage spinal puncture vasospasm, intracranial
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1彭钢.早期腰大池引流在降低已破裂动脉瘤术后脑积水发生中的作用[J].中国当代医药,2009,16(23):31-32. 被引量:8
  • 2林伟,余吉.持续性腰大池引流在神经科的应用[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2007,28(19):2348-2349. 被引量:5
  • 3Sadamasa N, YoshLda K, Narumi O, et al. Prediction of mor- tality by hematological parameters on admission in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Med Chir, 2011,51: 745-748.
  • 4NieuwkampDJ,AlgraA,BLomqvist P,et al. Excesmortality and cardiovascular events in patients surviving subarachnoid hemorrhage:a nationwide study in Sweden. Stroke,2011,42: 902-907.
  • 5Schmidt JM, Wartenberg KE, Fernandez A, et al. Frequency and clinical impact of asymptomatic cerebral infarction due to vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg, 2008,109 : 1052-1059.
  • 6Etminan N, Vergouwen MD, Ilodigwe D, et al. Effect of phar- maceutical treatment on vasospasm,delayed cerebral ischerni a,and clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarach- noid hemorrhage: a systematic review and recta-analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2011,31 : 1443-1451.
  • 7Keyrouz SG, Diringer MN. Clinical review: prevention and therapy of vasospasm in subarachnoidhemorrhlage. Crit Care, I 2007,11 : 220-229.
  • 8Pluta RM, Hansen-Schwartz J, Dreier J, et al. Cerebral vaso spasm following subaraehnoid hemorrhage: time for a new world of thought. Neurol Res,2009,31 : 151-158.
  • 9Kwon QY,Kim YJ,Kim YJ,et al. The utility and benefits of external lumbar CSF drainage after endovascular coiling on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2008,43 : 281-287.
  • 10吴军,毛广运,湛彦强,许杰,张金平,张苏明.脑脊液置换对蛛网膜下腔出血并发脑血管痉挛的影响[J].中国康复,2009,24(6):375-376. 被引量:8

二级参考文献16

共引文献16

同被引文献83

  • 1姜海涛,王逢鹏,谢江涛,李金正,朱莽,金星星,徐高峰,王茂德.乌司他丁对大鼠蛛网膜下腔出血后迟发性脑血管痉挛的影响及其脑保护作用[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2012,33(1):48-52. 被引量:6
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33091
  • 3余吉.持续性腰太池引流在神经科的应用[J].齐齐哈尔疾学院学报,2007,(28):2348-2549.
  • 4Pluta RM, Hansen-Schwartz J, Dreier J, et al. Cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage: time for a new world of thought [J]. Neurol Res,2009,31(2) : 151-158.
  • 5林伟,余吉.持续性腰大池引流在神经科的应用[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2007,28(19):2348-2349. 被引量:5
  • 6中华神经科学会,中华神经外科学会.各类脑吡管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):60-61.
  • 7白璐.复方丹参、低分子右旋糖酐联合前列腺素E1治疗脑梗死的疗效[J].中国医师进修杂志,2009,32(2):99-100.
  • 8Ayse Karatas,Volkan Cakir,Ertan Sevin,Omur Balli,Hamit Feran.??Angiographic assessment of variants of basal vein of Rosenthal in idiopathic subarachnoid hemorrhage(J)Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska . 2015 (4)
  • 9Bardutzky Jürgen,Witsch Jens,Jüttler Eric,Schwab Stefan,Vajkoczy Peter,Wolf Stefan.EARLYDRAIN- outcome after early lumbar CSF-drainage in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials . 2011
  • 10Thomas LE,Czuczman AD,Boulanger AB,Peak DA,Miller ES,Brown DF,Marill KA.Low risk for subsequent subarachnoid hemorrhage for emergency departmentpatients with headache, bloody cerebrospinal fluid, and negative findings oncerebrovascular imaging. Journal of Neurosurgery . 2014

引证文献14

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部