期刊文献+

股骨干粉碎性骨折的治疗 被引量:9

Treatment of the comminuted fracture of the femoral shaft
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨交锁髓内钉或锁定钢板治疗股骨干粉碎性骨折的临床疗效。方法采用微创技术治疗28例股骨干粉碎性骨折患者,16例行交锁髓内钉内固定,12例行锁定钢板内固定。结果患者均得到随访,时间6~24个月。切口均一期愈合,骨折无不愈合和畸形愈合。骨折临床愈合时间:交锁髓内钉组16~24周;锁定钢板组15~22周。根据Kotmert评分,交锁髓内钉组:优10例,良5例,可1例;锁定钢板组:优6例,良5例,可1例。结论股骨干粉碎性骨折治疗需根据骨折情况选择内固定,结合微创技术,均可获得良好的治疗效果。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of interlocking intramedutlary nail and locking plate in the treatment of the femoral shaft comminuted fracture. Methods 28 patients with femoral shaft fractures were recruited. 16 caseswere treated with the interlocking intramedullary nails and 12 cases with the locking plates by the way of minimally invasive technique. Results All the patients were followed up for 6 - 24 months. There were no wound problems and all fractures healed with nonunion or malunion. The clinical healing time for the intramedullary nailing group was 16 - 24 weeks and the locking plate group was 15 - 22 weeks respectively. Kotmert scoring showed that the intramedullary nailing group was excellent in 10 cases, good in 5, and fair in 1, the locking plate group was excellent in 6 cases, good in 5, and fair in 1. Conclusions The proper choices of type of internal fixation of surgical intervention along with minimally invasive technique, usually give good clinical results in the treatment of comminuted femoral fracture.
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2012年第5期528-529,共2页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词 股骨干骨折 骨折固定术 锁定钢板 交锁骨髓内钉 femoral shaft fracture fracture fixation locking plate interlocking intramedullary nail
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

共引文献20

同被引文献48

  • 1吴峰,卢绍燊,叶志军,陈希聪.带锁髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折的并发症原因分析及预防[J].中国骨伤,2005,18(8):464-465. 被引量:4
  • 2龚伟华,孙月华,朱振安,王友,史定伟,唐坚.微创技术治疗股骨远端骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(4):385-387. 被引量:31
  • 3于德富,王栋,许东伟.股骨粗隆间骨折手术治疗比较(附173例报告)[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(6):514-515. 被引量:103
  • 4Gangopadhyay S,Riley ND,Sivaji CK. Expanding nail or expanding femur an adverse event with the expandable intramedullary nail[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2010,(02):166-168.
  • 5Sanders R,Regazzoni P. Treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures using the dynamic condylar screw[J].{H}Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,1989,(03):206-213.
  • 6Haidukewych GJ,Berry DJ. Nonunion of fractures of the subtrochanteric region of the femur[J].{H}Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,2004,(419):185-188.
  • 7Papakostidis C,Grotz MR,Papadokostakis G. Femoral biologic plate fixation[J].{H}Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,2006,(450):193-202.
  • 8Kinast C,Bolhofner BR,Mast JW. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur:results of treatment with the 95 degrees condylar blade-plate[J].{H}Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,1989,(238):122-130.
  • 9Siebenrock KA,Müller U,Ganz R. Indirect reduction with a condylar blade plate for osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric femoral fractures[J].{H}Injury,1998,(Suppl 3):C7-C15.
  • 10K?seo?lu E,Durak K,Bilgen MS. Comparison of two biological internal fixation techniques in the treatment of adult femur shaft fractures(plate-screws and locked intramedullary nail)[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2011,(02):159-165.

引证文献9

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部