摘要
目的对比FujiⅡ加强型玻璃离子和光固化复合树脂修复楔状缺损的临床疗效,旨在为临床治疗提供理论指导依据。方法随机将我科2010年1月～2011年1月治疗的100例牙体楔状缺损患者分为FujiⅡ加强型玻璃离子组和光固化复合树脂组,每组各50例,比较两组的成功率及两组材料充填后失败原因。结果 FujiⅡ组成功率虽然高于光固化复合树脂组,但差异无统计学意义,两组均无一例发生牙髓炎、牙周炎,但光固化复合树脂组密合性差,充填物脱落率高。结论 FujiⅡ加强型玻璃离子和光固化复合树脂修复楔状缺损均具有较好的疗效,但FujiⅡ加强型玻璃离子疗效更理想,修复失败率低,值得推广和应用。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of FujiⅡ reinforced glass ionomer and light-cured composite resin for repairing the wedge-shaped defects. Methods In our department from January 2010 to January 2011, 100 cases dental wedge-shaped defect patients were divided into Fuji Ⅱ reinforced glass ionomer group and composite resin group, 50 cases in each, the success rate and the reasons for failure in the material filling between two groups were compared. Results Fuji Ⅱ composed of power although was higher than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant, no case of pulpitis, periodontitis, but light-cured composite resin group had poor and high off of fillings. Conclusion Fuji Ⅱ reinforced glass ionomer and light-cured composite resin for repairing the wedge-shaped defects have good effects, but Fuji Ⅱ reinforced glass ionomer has lower repair failure rate and is worthy of promotion and application.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2012年第25期50-51,共2页
China Modern Doctor
