摘要
在法学出现了各种流派以后,有一个重要现象值得法治论者去研究。这就是除了教义学属性的法律解释学以及分析实证主义法学以外,多数法学流派的主要观点都是对现行法律规范的效力进行程度不同的消解、修正、甚至废止。这一方面丰富了法学研究的内容,使人们更全面地理解法律,但另一方面也从不同的角度挑战了法律甚至法治的权威。对此,法治论者必须正视。在很多法学流派中,由于带有教义学属性的法律解释学的基本观点被批判,尤其是后现代法学对法治基本原则的解构,使我们感觉到,法律人的思维(包括法学研究)中出现了规范的失落或者说法律的隐退。本文分析了在法律决断论和主体选择论的矛盾下,法律规范的尴尬地位、规范隐退的表现、原因以及拯救的姿态与理路,所蕴涵的问题意识在于批判能动司法的理论基础。
After emergence of various schools of legal thought,an important phenomenon should be researched by commentators on the rule of law.This phenomenon is that,in addition to legal hermeneutics and analytical-positivist jurisprudence with dogmatics character,most schools of legal thought share the common opinions of dispelling,correcting or even abolishing the efficacy of current legal norms.It enriches the contents of legal research so that we can understand more about law on the one hand.On the other hand,it also challenges the authority of law or even the rule of law.Therefore,commentators on the rule of law must envisage it.The basic opinions of legal hermeneutic with dogmatics character have been criticized in many schools of legal thought.Especially,postmodern legal thought deconstructs the basic principles of the rule of law.All these help us to realize that there are some feelings of loss about norms or law’s retrogression existing in legal person’s thinking（including legal research） .Based on the contradiction between the theory of legal resolution and the theory of subject choice,this article analyzes the awkward status of legal norms,the representation and the reason of legal norms’ retrogression,and the right way to solve this problem.The questionable consciousness in this article arises from the theoretical basis of criticizing judicial activism.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期5-18,共14页
China Legal Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学吉林大学重点研究基地重大项目"法律方法理论研究"阶段性成果
项目编号:10JJD820008
