期刊文献+

不同学科学术社区知识共享行为影响因素对比分析 被引量:15

A Comparative Analysis on Influencing Factors of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Academic Virtual Communities of Different Disciplines
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于问卷调查,结合指标的描述性统计与结构方程模型,对自然科学、人文社科两类学术虚拟社区的知识共享行为影响因素进行对照分析。发现,各影响因素在两类学术社区中发挥着不同的作用。自然科学社区的成员信息性动机较强,而人文社科社区成员的参与则更多出于心理性动机;成员间的信任对两类社区的知识共享行为均有显著的正的影响,同时,自然科学社区成员更重视社区管理的有效性;两类社区中,成员的身份特征对浏览行为有积极影响,而自我效能对发帖行为有积极的正的影响;对于积分、等级、荣誉称号三种常用的激励形式,自然科学社区成员更认同前两者,人文社科社区的成员则更认同后两者。基于此,对不同学科领域学术社区的管理提出了建议。 Based on the questionnaire survey, the influencing factors of knowledge sharing behavior in academic virtual communities of different discipline are analyzed comparably through the descriptive statistical analysis and strnctural equation model of the observational indices in this paper. The result shows that the factors play different roles in the knowledge sharing behavior in the two types of academic virtual communities. Natural science community members have much stronger information motives, while humanities and social science community members are more out of psychogenic motive. In both types of communities, identity of members has a positive impact on the browsing behavior, and self-efficacy has a positive impact on posting behavior. In both types of communities, the trust between members significantly affects the knowledge sharing behavior. Meanwhile, natural science community members attach more importance to effective and reasonable community management, of the three common incentive forms: member points, level and honor, science community members attach more importance to the former two, while humanities and social science community members pay more attention to the latter two. Based on this, the management of different discipline academic communities is proposed.
作者 徐美凤
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期134-139,共6页 Journal of Intelligence
关键词 学术虚拟社区 知识共享行为 影响因素 学科特征 academic virtual community knowledge sharing behavior influencing factors discipline characteristic
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献19

  • 1王飞绒,柴晋颖,龚建立.虚拟社区知识共享影响因素的实证研究[J].浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版),2008,7(3):283-289. 被引量:17
  • 2陈嘉明.科学解释和人文理解[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,55(6):72-79. 被引量:7
  • 3董小英 李晓雷.网络环境下的大学图书馆与用户服务.21世纪大学图书馆的新使命--庆祝北京大学建校100周年国际学术研讨会论文集[M].北京大学出版社,1998.405.
  • 4黄长.面向二十一世纪的图书馆情报网络[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2002..
  • 5Toral S L,Martinez -Tortes M R,Barrero F. Analysis of virtual communities supporting OSS projects using social network analysis. Information and Software Technology, 2010, 52 (3) : 296 -303.
  • 6BOCK G W, KIM Y G. Breaking the myths of rewards: an ex- ploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing [ J]. Infor- mation Resources Management Journal, 2002, 15 ( 2 ) : 14-21.
  • 7HSU M H, JUT L, YEN C H, et al. Knowledge sharing be- havior in virtual communities: the relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations [ J ]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2007, 65 (2): 153-169.
  • 8WASKO M, FARAJ S. It is what one does : why people partici- pate and help others in electronic communities of practice [ J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2000, 9 ( 2/3 ) : 155-173.
  • 9ABRAMS L C, CROSS R, LESSER E, et al. Nurturing inter- personal trust in knowledge-sharing networks [ J]. Academy of Management Executive, 2003, 17 (4) : 64-77.
  • 10FANG Y H, CHIU C M. In justice we trust: exploring knowl- edge-sharing continuance intentions in virtual communities of practice [ J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010 (26): 235 -246.

共引文献200

同被引文献206

引证文献15

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部