期刊文献+

数据挖掘技术判定MRI乳腺非肿块样强化病灶的初步研究 被引量:13

Preliminary evaluation of data mining on non-masslike enhancement of breast lesions on MRI
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨数据挖掘技术评价MRI乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI—RADS—MRI)分析乳腺非肿块样强化病灶的价值。方法对55例行乳腺MR检查,且MRI增强表现为非肿块样强化病灶的患者,应用决策树和Logistic回归2种分类模型,对55个病灶进行分析。再将资料进行“10-折交叉验证”。结果55个病灶包括28个恶性肿瘤和27个良性病灶。簇状小环样和块状强化多出现在恶性病灶中[分别为12和d个;决策树模型中占8d.2%(16/19),Logistic模型中偏回归系数分别为2.128和1.723]。均匀、丛状、网状和线样导管样强化更易出现在良性病灶中[分别为4、9、1和7个;决策树模型中占72.4%(21/29),Logistic模型中偏回归系数分别为均匀0.357,丛状1.861,网状18.870]。10-折交叉验证评估2种模型Logistic回归的准确度57.0%,敏感度43.3%,特异度71.7%;决策树的准确度69.3%,敏感度66.7%,特异度71.7%。结论基于BI—RADS—MRI的非肿块样强化描述对该类病变作出正确诊断的效能不高,进一步对各种征象作出补充非常必要。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic values of the breast imaging reporting and data system-MRI (BI-RADS-MRI)description about non-masslike enhancement by data mining. Methods Fiftyfive patients with non-masslike enhancement lesions showed on breast contrast-enhanced MRI were evaluated using two data mining algorithms (Logistic regression and decision tree ) and 10-fold cross-validation methods. Results There were 28 malignant and 27 benign lesions. The most frequent findings of the malignant lesions were clustered ring enhancement and clumped enhancement [ 12 and 4 lesions, respectively; 84. 2% (16/19) in decision trees, partial regression coefficients in Logistic model were 2. 128 and 1.723, respectively], whereas homogenous, stippled, reticular internal and linear ductal enhancement were the most frequent findings in benign lesions [ 4,9,1 and 7 lesions, respectively; 72.4% (21/29) in decision tree, partial regression coefficients in Logistic model were 0. 357 (homogenous), 1. 861 (stippled) and 18. 870( reticular), respectively]. 10-fold cross-validation indicated that decision tree (C5.0) achieved an accuracy of 69. 3% with a sensitivity of 66. 7% and a specificity of 71.7% in comparison to the Logistic regression model with an accuracy of 57. 0%, a sensitivity of 43.3% and a specificity of 71.7%. Conclusions The diagnosis efficacy of non-masslike enhancement interpretation according to BI-RADS-MRI is not high. It is very important to find more potential features of non-masslike enhancement to improve the diagnosis accuracy.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期455-459,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 数据显示 磁共振成像 交叉研究 Breast neoplasms Data display Magnetic resonance imaging Cross-over studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system. 4ed. Reston: Am College Radiol, 2003:1-114.
  • 2Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors for focal breast masses. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2006,5:7-15.
  • 3Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non- masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR, 2006,187:330-337.
  • 4Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. AJR, 2006,187 : 313-321.
  • 5Cios, KJ, Moore GW. Uniqueness of medical data mining. Artif Intell Med, 2002, 26 : 1-24.
  • 6Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A. Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif Intell Med, 2005,34: 113-127.
  • 7Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR, 2003, 181:519-525.
  • 8顾雅佳 肖勤 邱龙华 等.非肿块样乳腺病变的MRI诊断步骤分析[J].当代医学中国肿瘤影像学,2008,1:39-42.
  • 9Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15:2010-2017.
  • 10顾雅佳,汪晓红,肖勤,杨文涛,曾炜,唐峰,毛健,郑晓静,彭卫军,冯晓源.乳腺导管原位癌及其微浸润的磁共振成像评价[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(3):248-253. 被引量:43

二级参考文献16

  • 1顾雅佳.规范乳腺X线报告[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(9):903-905. 被引量:46
  • 2Emster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, et al. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA, 1996,275:913-918.
  • 3Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH, et al. A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer, 1996, 77:2267-2274.
  • 4Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15:2010-2017.
  • 5Neubauer H, Li M, Kuehne-Heid B, et al. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR marnmography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Badiol, 2003, 76:3-12.
  • 6American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaning reporting and data system (BI-RADS) . 4th ed, Reston: Am College Radiol, 2003 : 1-259.
  • 7Morris EA. Illustrated breast MR lexicon. Semin Roentgenol,2001, 36: 238-249.
  • 8Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology, 2004, 233 :830-849.
  • 9Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrastenhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology, 1999, 213:881-888.
  • 10Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AIR, 2003, 181:519-525.

共引文献44

同被引文献154

引证文献13

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部