摘要
物权包括担保物权的设立和存续,当以"特定物"的存在为客观前提。而我国《物权法》第187、188条关于正在建造的建筑物、船舶以及航空器上抵押权何时设立的规定,显然违背了这一前提,导致了学理上的错误和体系上的混乱,应予适时纠正。
The being of the specialized thing should be the objective precondition to the creation and existence of the real right including security right. The provisions in the Chinese Property Law for when a hypothec is being created, attaching on the building, shipping and aerostat which is being built, breach the objective precondition, and result in the doctrinal mistakes and systematic conflicting. Therefore, these provisions should be revised at an appropriate time.
出处
《政法论丛》
2009年第2期31-34,共4页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
中国博士后科学基金资助项目<统一动产担保制度研究>的阶段性研究成果
关键词
物权法
特定物
预告登记
Property Law
specialized thing
advance notice registration
