期刊文献+

理解含义:理论、话语和国际关系 被引量:18

Understand Meanings: Theory, Discourse and International Relations
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,语言在国际关系中的重要作用逐渐引起人们的兴趣和关注,出现国际关系研究的“语言转向”。这一学术转向的意义在于,它试图探索国际关系中的人和事件如何在语言的作用下被赋予含义,以及这种含义反过来如何影响并建构着国际关系“现实”。符号含义的不固定性、多层性和争议性,不仅挑战了国际关系“知识”中的话语霸权现象,而且提醒人们有必要对国际关系的不同“现实”进行理解,并说明国际政治不仅是竞争物质实力的领域,而且还是争夺话语含义的场所。 In recent years, increasing interests have been taken in the role of language in International Relations (IR). The significance of this "linguistic turn" emerging in IR studies lies in its attempts to explore how meanings are given to peoples and events in IR by the game of language, and how they, in turn, help reshape and reproduce "realities" in IR. The instability, multidimensionality and disputability of symbolic meanings not only challenge the basis of hegemonic discourse in IR, but also make aware the necessity of understanding the different "realities" in IR. Thus international politics is a field of struggle not only for the competition of physical capabilities, but also for the dominance of discourse meanings.
作者 刘永涛
出处 《外交评论(外交学院学报)》 CSSCI 2007年第2期19-25,共7页 Foreign Affairs Review
基金 美国研究国家哲学社会科学创新基地"宗教和冷战后美国对外政策"项目研究的成果。
关键词 含义 理论 话语 国际关系 meanings theories discourse international relations
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Chris Barker,Dariusz Galasi n ski.Culture Studies and Discourse Analysis:A Dialogue on Language and Identity[M].London:Sage Publications,2001.
  • 2Michel Foucault.Discipline and Punish:The Birth of the Prison[M].New York:Vintage Books,1995.
  • 3Pierre Bourdieu.Language and Symbolic Power[M].John Thompson ed.Gino Raymond,Matthew Adamson trans.Massachusetts:Harvard University,1991.
  • 4Ludwig Wittgenstein.Philosophical Investigation,2nd edition.[M].G.E.M.Anscombetrans.Massachusetts:Blackwell Publishers Ltd.,1997.
  • 5Jügen Habermas.The Theory of Communicative Action[M].Boston:Beacon Press,1987.
  • 6Christ'l De Landtsheer.Introduction to the Study of Political Discourse[A].Ofer Feldman,Christ'l De Landtsheer.Politically Speaking:A Worldwide Examination of Language Used in the Public Sphere[C].Westpoint:Praeger,1998.
  • 7Frank Costigliola.Reading for Meaning Theory,Language,and Metaphor[A].Michael J.Hogan,Thomas G.Paterson.Explaining the History of American Foreign Relations[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004.
  • 8李少军.国际关系研究与诠释学方法[J].世界经济与政治,2006(10):7-13. 被引量:10
  • 9袁正清.交往行为理论与国际政治研究——以德国国际关系研究视角为中心的一项考察[J].世界经济与政治,2006(9):29-35. 被引量:30
  • 10Ken Booth.Beyond Critical Security Studies[A].Ken Booth.Critical Security Studies and World Politics[C].Boulder:Lynne Rienner Publishers,2005.

二级参考文献251

共引文献285

引证文献18

二级引证文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部