期刊文献+

应用规范化公式的MCDM保序研究 被引量:2

Study on Rank Preservation of the MCDM With Normalizing Formula
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 规范化公式的应用会破坏方案之间的独立性,导致逆序的产生。提出了两种改进规范化公式的方法以消除逆序,并以加权算术平均(WAA)集结算子的多属性决策分析(MCDM)为例验证了所提出方法的合理性和有效性。改进后的规范化公式不仅可以应用于WAA算子,还可以应用到其他类似的决策算子中。改进后规范化公式的应用可以降低和消除规范化公式对无关方案独立性的影响,使得MCDM决策过程更加合理、科学。 The application of the normalizing formula will result in violations of independence from irrelevant alternatives and lead to rank reversal. In the paper, the two methods that improve the original normalizing formula to erase the rank reversal are proposed; and a MCDM example based on the WAA operator is deduced to validate the conclusion using specific data at last. The methods mentioned can also be applied into other decision operators. The application of these methods can remove the influence of the normalizing formula to the independence from irrelevant alternatives and make the decision making more reasonable and scientific.
出处 《中国工程科学》 2006年第12期85-88,共4页 Strategic Study of CAE
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(90510010) 教育部博士点基金资助项目(20050287026)
关键词 MCDM决策 规范化公式 无关方案独立性 保序 逆序 MCDM decision normalizing violations of independence from irrelevant alternatives rank preservation rank reversal
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Zanakis S H, Solomon A, Wishart N, et al. Multiattribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 107 (3) : 507 - 529
  • 2Pan J P, Rahman S. Muhiattribute utility analysis with imprecise information: an enhanced decision support technique for the evaluation of electric generation expansionstrategies[J].Electric Power Systems Research, 1998,46 (2):101 - 109
  • 3Fernandez E, Leyva J C. A method based on multiobjective optimization for deriving a ranking from a fuzzy preference relation [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154(1): 110-124
  • 4Ramanathan R, Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2006, (5):1289 - 1307
  • 5Jerome R, Diederieh B A. Survey of decision field theory[J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2002, 43(3): 345 -370
  • 6Ehlers L. Independence axioms for the provision of multiple public goods as options [J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2001, 41(2) : 239 - 250
  • 7Gensch D H, Ghose S. Differences in independence of irrelevant alternatives at individual vs aggregate levels, and at single pair vs full choice set [J]. Omega, 1997, 25(2): 201-214
  • 8Dennis H, Ghose G S. Improving PRETREE' s predictive capabilities [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 97(3) : 465 - 479
  • 9Fry T L, Mark N H. A monte carlo study of tests for the independence of irrelevant alternatives property [ J ].Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1996, 30(1): 19-30
  • 10章玲,周德群.规范化公式对无关方案独立性的影响[J].系统工程,2005,23(5):124-126. 被引量:5

二级参考文献12

  • 1王莲芬,系统工程理论与实践,1996年,16卷,6期
  • 2王应明,系统工程理论与实践,1995年,15卷,1期
  • 3Zanakis S H, Solomon A, Wishart N, et al. Multi-attribute decision making:a simulation comparison of select methods[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1998,107(3):507~529.
  • 4Pan J P,Rahman S. Multiattribute utility analysis with imprecise information: an enhanced decision support technique for the evaluation of electric generation expansion strategies[J]. Electric Power Systems Research,1998,46(2): 101~109.
  • 5Fernandez E,Leyva J C. A method based on multiobjective optimization for deriving a ranking from a fuzzy preference relation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,154(1):110~124.
  • 6Ramanathan R.Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2005,(January):1~19.
  • 7Busemeyer J B,Diederich A. Survey of decision field theory [J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2002,43(3):345~370.
  • 8Ehlers L. Independence axioms for the provision of multiple public goods as options[J]. Mathematical Social Sciences,2001,41(2):239~250.
  • 9Gensch D H,Ghose S. Differences in independence of irrelevant alternatives at individual vs aggregate levels, and at single pair vs full choice set [J]. Omega,1997,25(2):201~214.
  • 10Gensch D H, Ghose S. Improving PRETREE's predictive capabilities[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1997,97(3):465~479.

共引文献8

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部