期刊文献+

头孢吡肟等抗生素对革兰阴性杆菌体外敏感性连续四年耐药性监测分析 被引量:22

Study on the antimicrobial activities of cefepime against gram-negative bacteria in vitro from 1999 to 2002 in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的监测和了解头孢吡肟对临床常见革兰阴性菌体外抗菌活性。方法从1999~2002年收集的临床常见革兰阴性杆菌50528株(主要为尿液、痰、伤口及其分泌物标本),连续监测4年。药物敏感性试验采用纸片扩散法,WHONET5软件进行结果分析。结果1999~2002年头孢吡肟对肠杆菌科细菌的敏感性为700%~952%;对铜绿假单胞菌敏感性为739%~775%。1999~2002年肠杆菌科细菌临床分离株对头孢噻肟、头孢他啶和头孢吡肟耐药性变迁的比较表明,头孢吡肟耐药率增加幅度低于头孢噻肟、头孢他啶;铜绿假单胞菌对头孢吡肟耐药率增加幅度明显低于哌拉西林、阿米卡星和头孢他啶。结论头孢吡肟对大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、弗劳地枸橼酸杆菌、产气肠杆菌、阴沟肠杆菌、奇异变形杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌有较好的体外抗菌活性。 Objective To study on the antimicrobial activities of cefepime against clinical isolates of Gram negative bacilli in vitro around the national networks of antimicrobial resistance from 1999 to 2002 Methods Disc diffusion test was used to study the antimicrobial resistance WHONET 5 was applied for analysis Results In the period of study from 1999 to 2002, 50 528 Gram negative bacteria strains were collected with first isolate by patient Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most common strains among the isolates Major specimens were sputum, urine as well as wounds and secretions Most of Enterobacteriaceae isolates were susceptible to cefepime (70 0%~95 2%) Susceptible rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to cefepime were 73 9% to 77 5% Change of antimicrobial resistance was not found in Enterobacteriaceae isolates resistant to cefepime by comparing with cefotaxime and ceftazidime Increasing rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in resistance to cefepime was lower than that to piperacillin, amikacin and ceftazidime in the study period Conclusions Cefepime was good antimicrobial activities against the clinical isolates of E coli, K pneumoniae, C freundi,E areogenes, E cloacae, P mirabilis, P aeruginosa and A baumannii in vitro
机构地区 [
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第11期747-751,共5页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 头孢吡肟 抗生素 革兰阴性杆菌 体外敏感性 耐药性监测 Cefepime Microbial sensitivity tests Gram-negative bacteria Drug resistance, microbial
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Murray PR , Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, et al. Manual of Clinical microbiology 7th ed. American society for microbiology, Washington, D.C.1999, 262-560.
  • 2National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 12th inform suppl. M2-A7 and M7-A5.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, pa, 2002, 42-49.
  • 3Naumiuk L, Samer A, Dziemaszkiewicz E. Cefepime in vitro activity against derepressed extended-spectrum β-lactamase(ESBL)-producing and non-ESBL-producing Enterobacter cloacae by a disc diffusion method. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2001,48:321-322.
  • 4Empey KM, Rapp RP, Evans ME.The effect of an antimicrobial formulary change on hospital resistance patterns. Pharmacotherapy, 2002,22:81-87.
  • 5Pfaller, MA, Jones, RN, Doern, GV, et al. Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with bloodstream infection: frequencies of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (United States and Cana
  • 6Giamarellou H Fourth generation cephalosporins in the antimicrobial chemotherapy of surgical infectionsJ Chemother, 1999,11:486-493.

同被引文献110

引证文献22

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部