摘要
目的 探讨七级语义量词赋值差值的分布规律。方法 165名士兵对同意程度和症状水平两组七级语义量词进行赋值,分析赋值差值的分布特征、组内各词赋值差值及高中组和初中组赋值差值之间的差异程度。结果 两组词的赋值差值均呈正偏态分布,两组词赋值差值相比,二者差异不显著 (Z= 0. 87,P>0. 05);组内各词赋值差值有显著性差异(症状水平F=15. 49,同意程度F=28. 15,P<0. 01),第一个词和第七个词与其他词赋值差值的差异性最大;被试赋值差值高中组和初中组相比,差异不显著 (Z= 1. 82,P>0. 05)。结论 语义量词赋值差值大小呈正偏态分布,两组词的赋值之间有一定的一致性;词与词之间赋值区间宽度差异较大;学历对赋值区间宽度的影响有待于进一步研究。
ObjectiveTo discuss the distributing-role of evaluating-diversity for seven-rating qualifiers. Methods165 private soldiers was requested to designate values for two group seven-rating qualifiers,much of them graduated from senior and junior high school. Analysis the distributing- character of evaluating-diversity. Make the compare inner each group. To study wether there have distinction between senior and junior high school students. Results Evaluating-diversities between groups assume positive skewness distrition.There are no significant difference between groups. Evaluating-diversities between words in each group have significant difference,most evidently between the first word or the seventh word and the other words. There are no significant difference between senior school group and junior school group.ConclusionEvaluating-diversities of qualifiers assume positive skewness distrition. Evaluating-diversities between qualifiers have certain consistency.There are significant difference between evaluating-diversity interval in words.Further research is now needed to explore the influence of educational level on evaluating-diversity interval.
出处
《中国行为医学科学》
CSCD
2004年第6期698-700,共3页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
基金
全军面上基金课题 ( 98M105 )
"十五"全军指令性课题(01L072)
