摘要
随着时代的变化 ,联合国关于国际和平与安全的定义也在不断发生变化。冷战时期 ,联合国所关注的安全问题主要是主权国家如何抵御外来军事干涉和入侵、防止核战争以及维护民族独立、领土完整方面的问题。与此同时 ,在联合国范围内 ,一种内容更广泛、更综合的“新安全概念”也逐渐成长起来。冷战结束后 ,联合国积极倡导包括“共同安全”、“人类安全”和“全球安全”在内的新安全观 ,完成了从传统安全概念到非传统安全概念的转变。联合国的安全观并不完全等同于西方的安全观 ,它是对不同国家和不同地区安全考虑平衡的结果 ,具有更多的理想主义、制度主义和全球主义色彩。一方面 ,我们应该看到 ,联合国对非传统安全的关注反映了冷战后世界安全形势的变化和各国安全利益关注点的变化 ,因而具有积极意义和指导意义 ,值得各国在制定本国政策时加以借鉴和参考 ;另一方面 ,我们也应该关注这种“新安全观”给联合国组织本身及其成员国带来的新问题。
With the evolution of the times, the UN's definitions of security have been changing. During the Cold War period, the UN's concept of security was interpreted narrowly to mean territorial security from external aggression, security to maintain national independence, or security from global nuclear war. At the same time, a new security concept emerged gradually within the UN, identifying security in a more comprehensive way. Since the end of the Cold War, the UN has been advocating a new security concept and related notions, including“human security,” “common security,”and“global security.”This has led to the transformation from a traditional to a non-traditional UN security concept. As a result of the balancing of different national and regional security needs, the new UN security concept is characterized by more idealism, institutionalism, and globalism. On the one hand, we should recognize that the transformation of the UN security concept is a reflection of the changing world environment and of the shifts in national security interests, so it should have positive and instructional bearings on the UN member states. But, on the other hand, we should be mindful of the new problems caused by too broad of a definition of security and by abuses of“non-traditional security.”
出处
《世界经济与政治》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第8期49-54,共6页
World Economics and Politics
