期刊文献+

明代内阁相权的一点质疑 被引量:1

Questions on the Power of Cabinet Minister in Ming Dynasty
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 明代内阁的地位与作用是明史研究中的重大课题,一向为学术界所关注。王世贞认为明代内阁具有相权性质,《明史》亦称首辅俨然汉唐宰辅。但是根据山西陈卿社会动乱以及杨一清内阁处理该事件的经过,明代内阁首辅不具备丞相职掌,当时首辅虽尊称宰辅,但究其实际,其身份与作用并未改变“备顾问而已”这一根本性质。 The status and the function of cabinet minister in Ming Dynasty, an important subject for the study of Ming Dynasty, have been a great concern of the academic world. Wang shi-zhen stated the cabinet in Ming Dynasty possessed the power of minister. In The History of Ming Dynasty, cabinet minister was called grand secretary just like the premier in Han and Tang Dynasty. According to the study on the social turmoil led by Chen qing in Shanxi and the process of Yang yi-qing’s dealing with the turmoil, the paper argues the grand secretary of the cabinet in Ming Dynasty does not possess the power of prime minister. Although the grand secretary then was called premier, he simply acted as counselor in nature.
作者 何兆吉
出处 《大连民族学院学报》 CAS 2004年第4期58-61,共4页 Journal of Dalian Nationalities University
关键词 明代内阁 相权 质疑 cabinet the power of minister question
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]王士贞.嘉靖以来首辅传序[M].四库全书本.
  • 2[2]明史(卷109)宰辅年表序[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
  • 3科大卫.动乱官府与地方社会[J].中山大学学报,2001,(2).
  • 4[6]杨一清集.密谕录卷7[M].北京:中华书局,2001.
  • 5[7]明史(卷202)潘埙传[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
  • 6[10]黄佐,廖道南.殿阁词林记(卷9)[M].
  • 7[14]明史(卷109)[M].北京:中华书局,1974.

共引文献1

同被引文献27

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部