摘要
目的了解三年制博士和八年制博士的盲审结果,探讨八年制教育的改进措施。方法采用资料分析法,选择华中科技大学第一临床学院2020年送审的47名八年制博士和88名三年制博士的学位论文作为研究资料。采用SPSS 17.0软件进行卡方检验,比较学位论文各项评价意见,Spearman检验分析总体评价与答辩意见、分项评价意见的相关性。结果两类博士在基础知识和科研能力、论文规范性及总体评价上差异无统计学意义,但在选题与综述(χ^(2)=5.70,P=0.017)、创新性及论文价值(χ^(2)=9.10,P=0.003)方面八年制博士弱于三年制博士。论文规范性与两类博士如期参与答辩的相关性最强(八年制r_(s)=0.53,P<0.001;三年制r_(s)=0.45,P<0.001)。基础知识和科研能力与八年制博士学位论文的总体评价密切相关(r_(s)=0.74,P<0.001)。结论八年制博士在学术素养和学术态度方面和三年制博士差异无统计学意义,而在科研创新能力方面差异有统计学意义。建议明确八年制临床医学教育的培养目标,制定和细化符合八年制的学位论文评价体系,加强科研兴趣和学术信念方面的培养。
Objective To understand the results of blind evaluation of dissertation of three-year doctors and eight-year medical doctors,and to explore the improvement measures of eight-year program education.Methods The data analysis method was manipulated.A total of 47 eight-year doctoral and 88 three-year doctoral dissertations submitted by the first clinical college of Huazhong University of Science and Technology in 2020 were selected as the research material.SPSS 17.0 was used to perform Chi-square test to compare the itemized evaluation opinions of the dissertation,Spearman test was used to analyze the correlation between the defense opinions,itemized evaluation opinions and the overall evaluation.Results The gap between eight-year and three-year doctoral dissertation is mainly manifested in innovation and research value(χ^(2)=9.10,P=0.003),topic and review(χ^(2)=5.70,P=0.017),while there is no significant difference in the overall assessment and oral defense suggestion.The main influencing factor of dissertation defense suggestion for both doctors was the dissertation standardization(eight-year:r_(s)=0.53,P<0.001;three-year:r_(s)=0.45,P<0.001).The evaluation results of eight-year doctor dissertation were closely related to basic knowledge and scientific research ability(r_(s)=0.74,P<0.001).Conclusion There is no significant difference between eight-year doctors and full-time doctors in research attitude.But there was a certain gap in scientific research and innovation ability among them.It is suggested to clarify the teaching objectives,formulate and refine the evaluation system of dissertations,and strengthen the cultivation of scientific research interest and academic belief of eight-year study program.
作者
彭妙
柯晓华
肖先金
张蜀靖
郭涛
张进祥
杨坤禹
孙亚洁
亓来华
Peng Miao;Ke Xiaohua;Xiao Xianjin;Zhang Shujing;Guo Tao;Zhang Jinxiang;Yang Kunyu;Sun Yajie;Qi Laihua(Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology Teaching Office,Wuhan 430022,China;Graduate Management Office,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China;Cancer Center,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China)
出处
《中华医学教育探索杂志》
2022年第11期1454-1458,共5页
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基金
华中科技大学2020年教学研究项目(2020149)
2020年医学教育研究课题项目(2020B-N04199)
关键词
八年制医学教育
学位论文
评阅结果
科研培养
Eight-year medical education
Dissertation
Evaluation result
Cultivation of research potential
