摘要
共有推定规则是我国物权法特有的立法例,其传统来自司法实践中的民通意见。源自域外的共同共有"类型强制"学说,对共有推定规则的解释力不足,容易造成司法实践中的同案异判。中国法语境下,应扬弃共同共有"类型强制"的观点,明确共有关系可以由共有人自由约定。共有推定规则是以填补共有人意思表示缺陷为目标的法律推定,非法律拟制;"家庭关系等"作为除外规定,是开放性的而非封闭性的。共有推定规则的转向对共有关系定性以及"一般共有"的适用产生了重要影响。民法典时代应加强对共有推定规则的本土化解释,以便有效回应本国实践问题。
The rule of presumption of common is a unique legislative example of China’s Property Law,and its tradition comes from the General Principles of the Civil Law in judicial practice.The theory of"typenzwang"of common has insufficient explanatory power for the rule of presumption of common,and it is easy to result in dissimilarity judgments in similar cases.In the context of Chinese law,the idea of"typenzwang"should be improved and it should be made clear that co-ownership can be freely agreed upon by co-owners.The rule of presumption of common is a legal presumption aiming at filling the deficiency of declaration of will of co-owners,rather than a legal fiction."Family relationship",as an exception,is open rather than closed.The change of the rule of presumption of common has an important influence on the definition of co-ownership and"co-ownership in common"in judicial practice.In the era of the Civil Code,localization interpretation of the rule of presumption of common should be enhanced in order to effectively respond to domestic practice problems.
出处
《东方法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期189-200,共12页
Oriental Law
关键词
共有推定规则
类型强制
按份共有
共同共有
民法典
财产法
presumption of common
typenzwang
several possession
co-ownership
the Civil Code
the Property Law
