摘要
公共行政学的范式之争,不仅是事关公共行政学身份危机的核心问题,也是公共行政学历史思辨中看似不言自明实则言之未明的关键问题。破解该问题的认知迷雾,迫切需要我们从范式概念的源头领悟中构建"学术共识"与"学科规范"的认知逻辑,从存在论、转换论与场景论的形式之争回到公共行政的事实本体,在本体视角解析中寻找破解范式之争的密码。并且需要以反思性、主体性、科学性的态度找到范式建构的传统基因与历史依据,从提出真问题、供给真概念、构建协同式学术生态与强化实践性社会功能四个方面建构公共行政学的"中国话语体系"。
The paradigm controversy of public administration not only is a core issue concerning the identity crisis of public administration,but also is a key issue in the historical speculation of public administration.By tracing the etymology of the term"paradigm",this essay construct the cognitive frame of"academic consensus"and"disciplinary norms".The author holds to the view that,there are growing number of public administration theorists are taking up the question of ontology,so it is required to find the traditional genes and historical basis for the paradigm construction with a reflective,objective and scientific attitude,so as to construct the"Chinese Discourse System"of public administration from four aspects:asking a true question,supplying true concepts,constructing collaborative academic ecology and strengthening practical social functions.
作者
姜晓萍
谭振宇
Jiang Xiaoping;Tan Zhenyu
出处
《政治学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第2期3-13,187,共12页
CASS Journal of Political Science
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“基本公共服务均等化实现程度的评价研究”(19AZD017)的研究成果
关键词
范式之争
公共行政本体
中国公共行政学范式
paradigm controversy
ontology of public administration
paradigm of Chinese public administration
